• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What an unusual stance. You eluded to the externalities of other sources as your concern. For coal I would agree. However, for wind and solar the studies have shown those to be substantially cheaper even with externalities factored in.

    What do you base your reasoning on that wind and solar are not factoring in externalities?

    • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that wind and PV solar power are similar to most other industries besides nuclear power in that the management of the lifecycles of such deployments isn’t well planned or funded. I myself have encountered a derelict wind farm and I have to wonder if that’s just the way it’s supposed to go after investors extract their short-term profits. As these renewable projects decline in performance (both in terms of actual electricity production and fictional financial viability), I guess the horizon will just keep collecting their skeletons.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This doesn’t seem like a strong argument against wind that a wind farm planned for a 20 year life ran for 20 years, and was then dismantled.

        I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but I can only make some assumptions about where the gravity is for your point.

        • Are you arguing that a wind farm, once existing, should continue in perpetuity or not be built at all?
        • Are you arguing that an abandoned wind farm isn’t pleasant to look at?

        I’m interested in your viewpoint.