• iustitia@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    An evaluation of good or bad an OS is for privacy should first and firemost focus on the actual OS, not the biggest contributer. It is an important point, and it would be way way more important if Android wasn’t open source. But it is, and it can easily be checked by security researchers. So saying Google bad (which I agree with ftr), and everything Google touches bad, would not only exclude you from many open source projects like linux, it would also not be a good aporoach to make a good, informed choice about your digital life.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we judge Android on its own, yes, it can be incredibly safe and secure for its open source abilities. But that conventionally ignores everything else. Google pushes Android forward, Google creates the SDKs, Google creates the IDEs, Google creates all the non-phone variants of the OS. Android isn’t on GitHub, it’s on Google’s servers. “Biggest contributor” is an understatement.

      • iustitia@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        conveniently ignores

        Is this about how private and secure the actual usage of the actual OS is, or what?

        • Tony Bark@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve given up trying to discuss this topic that’s already been downvoted to oblivion, anyway. But, if you’re curious, I was trying to get the point that Android is pretty useless without the whole Infrastructure Google built, but they kept making it about ASOP. As if the average Joe even knows what that is.

          • Scorpion3869@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You realize the “average joe” is not the target audience of this content right?
            Do realize what platform you’re on.

              • Scorpion3869@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                And You believe their marketing?
                Maybe instead of that, you read their Privacy Policies and TOS; see for yourself.

                • Tony Bark@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Don’t put words in my mouth, and drop it already. This argument has gone on long enough. It is inconsequential and pointless. No one is settling or agreeing to fucking anything.