• TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    While it’s good to be skeptical, algae tanks like this are actually a good idea for the use-cases for which they are designed. Places where trees would be difficult and expensive to grow. The tanks more efficiently capture carbon, require less maintenance, produce fertilizer as a byproduct and the solar panels on the tank produce enough extra power for there to be a USB charger on the bench. The goal isn’t to replace trees with tanks but to use them where it makes sense to do so.

  • leggettc18@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    To echo what some other people have said, these algae tanks absolutely should not be used instead of trees. If I see a tree get chopped down and replaced with one of these, I’ll be sad and angry. However, these can go in places where trees can’t go, like rooftops. And you don’t have to either wait for a tree to grow for a decade or take a tree from somewhere else to install one. It also serves as both a seating area and can mount a solar panel on top. These and trees both have their place and should both continue to be used.

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well Trees don’t make as much money for rich people who own everything and Trees make hot days more comfortable for homeless people

  • smiling_big_baby_boy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    We are in a parasitic relationship with capitalism. Capitalism constantly extracts from life and the environment. When life begin to limit captialism, capitalism will go to great ends to remove life. Capitalism is not sustainable, nor is it naturally occurring. Abolish this evil system.

  • Doctor xNo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s been proven that humans didn’t actually get most of their fresh air from the rainforest, but actually from millions of these algea in the sea… Which is actually more logical, since trees do the opposite at night, kinda undoing any advantage they made during the day… Hence why it’s said you should never put a decorative small tree or even plants in the bedroom as they can take away oxygen levels in closed rooms at night. It’s even said not to sleep under trees outside at night cause it can cause respiratory problems.

    • Micromot@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      They don’t use enough oxygen over night to negate the effect as they use the carbon to grow. It’s still bad to have a lot of plants in your bedroom, but it doesn’t really matter as long as they are relatively small.

        • Micromot@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They consume oxygen during the night so when you have a lot of them it can cause respiratory problems, that is for the bedroom

          • Gork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            An effective HVAC system makes this a non-issue. It isn’t like the air is stagnant, the air handler keeps air moving.

  • dtc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    So I think the general idea is that you can convert more CO² to carbon in the form of sugars and O² molecules per square foot with algae than with trees. Trees would totally do the same thing if we ripped up all the concrete and buildings to replant a forest, but that process would take decades.

    This can be added into existing infrastructure and helps I guess. Kinda a neat concept.