• fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You can get thin clients for much less than that… Better performance if needed, similar power efficiency for similar loads, they sometimes bring storage, power supply and ram and you don’t generate more e-waste as these are already being thrown out by many big companies every few years.

    The only reason to go for the PI is if you really need the GPIO, the tiny form-factor and even then there are cheaper alternatives with similar or better spevs.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thin clients are just regular x86 boxes, they’re miles ahead of every SBC. The only downsides for consumers are slightly bulkier sizes, slightly higher power draw and of course the gpio/Hat ecosystem is not available, but I would argue that for most people that’s not really relevant.

      • somenonewho@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. As someone running a NAS/Jellyfin server of a SBC/USB SSD I would love to pick up an x86 sffpc too properly put everything inside but idle power and quiet aren’t easily beat.

        Software support olinwouldnt really agree since x86 gives a lot more options than ARM

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My RPi 3b pulls 5W, while my thin clients draw about 6-7W on idle, one of them doesn’t even have a fan, the other one could easily be modded to lose the fan.

    • DopamineDaydreams@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uhuh, for work we love raspberry PIs as they’re small enough to stick behind a wall mounted TV and good enough to run our display apps. All for the low price of £80~. I’d love it if you have viable alternatives.