• Betch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah I really hope other car makers follow because I fucking hate touch controls in cars with a burning passion. It’s idiotic and not safe at all.

    • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same goes for kitchens. Give me real buttons and knobs and not these abhorrent touch panels that refuse to work every third time. A good quality kitchen appliance is identified by high quality knobs that last for decades.

      • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Biggest problem is that they cheap out on the tech parts. Nobody complains that an iPad has a touch screen, cause it works. But an appliance tends to have a crappy UI, running on a crappy touch screen, powered by a crappy CPU.

        If they just used quality parts, it’d probably be fine, and the only issue would be expensive replacement for an entire assembly, instead of small, cheap parts that can be fixed.

        • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          A smartphone or tablet screen has the function to have multiple buttons and responsive functions on one and the same place.

          A kitchen appliance doesn’t have or need that. Absolutely no need for digital or so-called “smart” gimmicks.

          • Dojan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah! Instead of having a knob my idiot stove has “touch areas” - good luck cooking if you’re blind.

            At my old place, if I wanted to set the bottom left plate to the hottest setting, I’d put my hand on the leftmost knob and turn counter-clockwise until it snapped once.

            On this thing I usually have to start with turning off the child lock. We never turn it on, but every time we wipe off the stove there’s a like 95% chance the child lock activates due to the lingering moisture.

            After turning the child lock off you have to hold the power “zone.” Then you have to select which burner by holding its zone - if you don’t you’ll start changing the timer when you hold down the - button to cycle from 0 to keep warm, to 9, and then press + to turn it from 9 to boost.

            I’m legit not joking. Mind you this example is when the piece of shit behaves. I’ve an absentmindedly placed lids on the off “button” before and had the piece of junk refuse to turn back on for half an hour.

            What does the touch controls add to my experience other than frustration? A knob doesn’t activate from water splashes. A knob doesn’t turn from residual moisture from a slightly damp cloth. A knob is tactile and pleasing to hold, and can be used by anyone of appropriate age, even if they’re blind.

            Four knobs could pull the weight that these NINE touch “buttons” fucking struggle with.

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I pumped gas at a brand new Shell station over the weekend. The controls for the pump was one GIANT touchscreen (I’m talking probably 12 inches wide by 36 inches tall). It was fucking PAINFUL to use. Every touch took 2-3 seconds for the action to happen. Da fuck is wrong with a regular pump and regular buttons that just work!?

        • ZiemekZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          What do you need a touchscreen for? You just take an appropriate pump (E95, Diesel), fill the fuel and pay at the register.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Because it’s way faster to pay at the pump and not have to go inside. I’ve only been inside a gas station like 4-5 times in the last decade.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          In Canada it really sucks having to take your gloves off half the year. I hope this gets taken into account when touchscreens on gas pumps are considered.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Try wearing very thin neoprene under your bigger gloves. It’s been a game changer for me. I have a horrible habit of taking my gloves off from years of snowboarding and those have been awesome.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s not true though. This happened in their EVs regardless of price range. Even the Porsche Taycan which requires using a screen to adjust HVAC vents. Other than some steering wheel buttons the Taycan is all screens.

      The Audi E-Tron GT (same chassis as the Taycan) oddly enough has more buttons. But that’s because VAG makes sure Porsche and Audi interiors are slightly different for different market segments.

      It’s more about VAG thinking (like many automakers) copying the Tesla trend was what people wanted. The mistake made was not considering Tesla early adopters often being techy people who might not match broader market opinion.

  • Dickarus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like how you can get a ticket for using your phone while driving, so automakers decided to replace your tactile radio, where you don’t need to look at it to operate, with what is basically a giant touchscreen phone in your car where you need to look at it to see what you’re doing instead of feeling what you’re doing.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep it should just be illegal plain and simple. Maybe some screens that are mainly intended for passive display that you can still use with touch, but all main functions one would need to use while operating the vehicle should be buttons and dials.

        • TeckFire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Many states have laws prohibiting the use of anything that isn’t hands free, including integrated media controls. Won’t stop anyone, but just because it’s illegal doesn’t mean people won’t do it. Same as speeding, or eating/drinking while driving in many states.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    and to add insult to injury, I couldn’t turn the heater on countless times because the climate portion of the OS was unresponsive. Other times, it would simply say that the function couldn’t be performed at the time. Why? No idea.

    This is the main problem, not something about the UI being wonky. That my AC can freeze not because of the radiator but because of a shitty UI system? That’s insane.

  • Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is actually very good news for car manufacturers.

    Touch crap was cheaper but sold a new tech so => price increase

    Buttons are old tech so no new investments or tech development but they are more complicated => price increase

      • Gerula@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They 100% do! But the marketing departments always likes to have “solid” arguments at hand.

        How else can they organise fairs and conferences where they can lament about how poor the automakers are and how pressure from are pulling prices down so automakers cannot compete… how they have to fire people and move production in poorer countries where people can be treated more like slaves… how profits are so low that they have to use the same jets with the same bitches twice!

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Carmakers did this to copy Tesla, not realising that Tesla did it to save themselves a few bucks and to hell with the person who suffer a degraded or unsafe driving experience as a result. Witness how Tesla even removed indicator stalks, making it all but impossible for people to safely and legally navigate a roundabout. Who cares if someone crashes, because it’s all about the bottom line.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      not realising that Tesla did it to save themselves a few bucks

      I guarantee you they realized that and likely did it for the same reason.

  • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m very glad, the lack of buttons are a safety hazard… Looking at these stupid TESLA cars especially… You can’t even adjust the AC without messing with the touchscreen, which means your eyes are not on the road…

    Still not going to own a car, but at least it will be slightly safer by bringing back physical buttons, so hurray for small victories.

    • LittleHermiT@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I said the same to a Tesla owner who informed me buttons on the steering wheel provide all these functionalities. But upvoters don’t own a Tesla.

      • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not all functionalities. You can’t even adjust the direction/power of the AC or open the glovebox without multiple presses on the touchscreen.

        • LittleHermiT@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s no physical button to open the glovebox? Better not keep anything critical in there in case of a software failure.

          • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Either software or hardware failure of the big infotainment system can suck really badly, and TESLA is also an anti-repair company too…

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The fact that they needed to receive a lot of complaints to reconsider makes me wonder - do they even do any kind of usability testing for their products? Anyone who even sat in a car with only touchscreen can tell you the experience is not comfortable.

    And I don’t think it’s just about the price of physical buttons. Buttons are a selling point right now, they could charge a small premium (not in the thousands but ~$200 certainly.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s probably a cost issue. Running one wire harness to a touch screen is a lot cheaper than running a wire to every button in a car.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Good. Touchscreens are the most unsafe feature added to vehicles in decades. It’s honestly mind boggling how it was allowed in the first place.

    • highenergyphysics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Easy, because regulations don’t mean anything anymore.

      Headlights that blind you in the day and literally block all vision of the road at night, road legal trucks which bumpers that START at the hood of my car, all around limo tints on literally every car, people disabling their rear lights for some idiotic reason…

      And that doesn’t even begin to mention the drivers themselves, so fucking self absorbed, tailgating, cutting you off for fun to get to the same light.

      I’ve literally had a stream of cars going around me on street roads and so many dumbasses just follow the stream that I literally cannot safety accelerate because they’re all cutting me off bumper to bumper.

      You should start carrying a gun if not already. The conservatives have successfully rotted western society.

      • Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        While you have some good points, it seems you may be missing one in that if you are constantly getting passed in that manner, you are causing a problem, regardless of what is posted. Most western law systems have a provision against impeding the flow of traffic.

        • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Problem is when you get passed because other people aren’t driving legally. Even if it’s the flow of traffic, you’re still technically not allowed to break the law.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t mind a touchscreen. Apple CarPlay/Android Auto are really nice.

      I just also want physical controls for everything the car needs to do to be a car, like climate control or wipers or shifting. And also physical controls for play/pause, skip, volume, and tuning.

      Touchscreens can do a lot to enhance the car experience, but they cannot replace physical buttons.