https://zeta.one/viral-math/

I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.

It’s about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it’s worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I’m probably biased because I wrote it :)

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Will you accept wolfram alpha as credible source?

    https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Solidus.html

    Special care is needed when interpreting the meaning of a solidus in in-line math because of the notational ambiguity in expressions such as a/bc. Whereas in many textbooks, “a/bc” is intended to denote a/(bc), taken literally or evaluated in a symbolic mathematics languages such as the Wolfram Language, it means (a/b)×c. For clarity, parentheses should therefore always be used when delineating compound denominators.

    • Danksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The link references “a/bc” not “a/b*c”. The first is ambiguous, the second is not.