• Anas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m back on Firefox now, but I did originally leave it because Edge had the speed. Not sure if that’s because it’s more optimized for Windows.

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean yeah, all these big tech companies are trying to make their products feel faster, because that’s the only space they can compete. When it comes to privacy, they all lose.

    • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      YouTube videos for some reason won’t load for me on Firefox. I switched to the Waterfox fork and it’s fine.

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, Google has been caught trying to make their sites slower / malfunctioning on Firefox. Usually they get away with it by saying it’s a mistake.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Google just maliciously makes their websites work way worse on Firefox. For YouTube I personally just use FreeTube on desktop and Tubular (A NewPipe fork) on Android so I never have to interact with that goddamn website

        • foreverandaday@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          As someone who uses tubular I wish it got updated more tho. The number of debug versions I have installed from pull requests is like 5 at this point 😭

          • timestatic@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m fine with a slow update cycle as long as they don’t wait too long to actually merge app breaking features, like when recently youtube changed a few things and videos would no longer load.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use firefox, I mostly like it, but it still doesn’t support chromium style tab groups (no, that one extension is not similar), and its webgpu implementation also doesn’t work on most websites more than a year after Google made their version available by default

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve been using Vivalid, they have ‘Workspaces’ which is different but in a way that was a pleasant surprise and kind of reminds me of older systems. Imagine working with one tab group at a time and the rest disappear when you’re not on that workspace.

    • dinozaur@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not sure if this is “that one extension”, but I use Simple Tab Groups for Workspaces-like functionality, similar to Edge and Vivaldi. I know, it isn’t tab groups, but I use it similarly.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mozilla could definitely be putting their development time into the areas that the browser is actually behind in

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    How convenient that this happens just a few days after Firefox implements the features that have been blocking me from switching for the last few years.

    Still, I’m curious about other browsers. We know Chrome is killing V2, but what about other Chromium-based browsers? I saw below a comment espousing Brave, but I’d rather use Chrome than Brave because of the gross crypto bs. What about Vivaldi, Opera, and Chredge? Will they keep supporting Manifest V2?

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      just a few days after Firefox implements the features that have been blocking me from switching for the last few years.

      Which are those?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Multi-window support on iPad is the main one. Less important, though it would have bugged me if they didn’t have it, is sustained Incognito tabs—which apparently they had until a couple of months ago, then removed without explanation, then added back in just 1 day ago, also without explanation. Found a thread on their forums with a whole bunch of people perplexed and asking what happened.

        • ivn@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are actually no alternative browser on iOS. Before the European Digital Market Act all iOS browser have to use webkit, so while you could install Firefox, Chrome and others, they were actually using Safari’s rendering engine. I believe that’s where a lot of the limitations come from. Now with the DMA Firefox could use it’s own rendering engine but this hasn’t landed yet. I don’t know if any other browser has switched from webkit yet.

        • Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Your first point at least is an iPad thing. Nothing is fully featured on the iPad. Not even safari. It’s thanks to that exact fact that chrome is at least mostly fully featured on the iPad. If safari had comparable function, you could bank on them blocking those features from the chrome app too. There’s a deal made somewhere. I wouldn’t be surprised if cash flow from Google is why safari is still the same piece of crap it always has been. “Hey your R&D + return for safari only nets you 1% YOY. We’ll give you 2% YOY if you just don’t even bother.”

          They only know raising prices and knee-jerk reactions to competitive moves in their market space. Additional functionality for the user is only granted when it’s being used as a cudgle against their competition. Never for users benefit.

          If you’re seeing new functionality on the iPad Firefox app, it’s likely because Firefox figured out a way to implement it without paying apple because they want the user to have that function. Totally different ethos.

  • fuy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m using AdNauseam instead. So ad networks, what exactly are you collecting?

    • ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Click fraud is a big thing, with lots of counter measures, I don’t see how they could go past them as they are saying themselves that they have a very naive approach. To me it’s useless at best, but more probably counterproductive.

      • fuy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you’re right about click fraud. Actually, I use AdNauseam primarily to disrupt non-consensual targeted advertising. Even if the impact is small, I’m obfuscating my profile as a form of protest against tracking.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mozilla’s slowly creeping in the surveillance with adding integrated crap like Pocket and AI driven Fake Spot. I’m really glad Librewolf’s made a privacy focused fork of their browser without all that nonsense.

    • menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Related announcement: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

      TLDR: Mozilla wants your data and it’s opt out. If you’re on FF 128 it’s already on and you will have to turn it off manually. Shame how they have fallen this low. The LEAST they could have done is show a pop up announcement when the user upgraded to 128.

      Also: +1 to Librewolf. Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future. Definitely the better option over Firefox.

          • Zorro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Wasn’t Firefox supposed to incorporate Servo in some way or another before Quantum was developed?

            • owlet@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think the Quantum release was what integrated some major components of the servo project.

          • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            So long as it survives rusts complexity and lack of portability. I’m always down for more options!

            • owlet@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              rust is complex and non-portable?

              i’ve never heard of this, do you mind explaining what you mean better?

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but I just read that whole article and it sounds like a good implementation? Companies want to know how effective their ads are, and I like their approach of trying to find a way to provide this without wholesale personal data collection. They even say at the end that they don’t get the data either. It sounds like a reasonable thing to try and standardize.

        • menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not commenting on implementation itself but rather on how Mozilla went about with an opt-out approach into the collection program (even if it was for testing) to a community they have cultivated with the promise of privacy.

          Collecting my data is a big deal. It doesn’t matter how it is used. I should at least consent to it.

      • Zacryon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve read the announcement. Sounds reasonable and sufficiently private to me. So saying “Mozilla wants your data” sounds misleading and like an overreaction to me. Also might help to mitigate the arms race in privacy protection versus tracking for ads and worse stuff.

        Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future.

        How do you know that?

        Even if, there will still be alternatives. But right now, Firefox is the best browser with regards to privacy and security. It even passed minmum ratings by the german IT security authority, contrary to other widely used browsers.

      • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        A lot of sites? Or more like just a few? Personally, the ratio of working vs broken sites is like 100 to 1 and when a site is broken, its usually one of those shit pile SSO listicle sites or some absolute trash heap of ads. Every time I’ve disabled the protections I’ve regretted it.

        A lot of the web is useless trash nowadays and Librewolf has done a good job of filtering that for me.

  • VarosBounska@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I do not study in detail if this combination is necessary, but:

    • Firefox (of course)
    • Ghostery
    • Ublock Origin
    • Privacy Badger
    • Decentraleyes
    • Disconnect
      • Matriks404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Have you not heard the news? Mozilla essentially have become an advertising company by acquiring adtech start-up called Anonym. I think the only way to escape this bullshit is by installing privacy-enabled Firefox fork (such as LibreWolf) or to wait for an alternative web browser to rise up (like Ladybird or Servo) which has user freedom and privacy in its first priority, which is something that Mozilla doesn’t seem to care lately.

        • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          no I don’t, I have not keeping up with browser news lately after switched to Floorp, not sure if I still live long enough to see Ladybird or Servo officially released

  • Kay_Angel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What does chromium-based browsers on pc have that Firefox doesn’t have? Like I don’t understand why people use Chrome instead of Firefox.

    • Baizey@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      One thing for danish people is the “online government id” (MitID) everyone has and needs to use for online purchases and logins to banks and various other things.

      It straight up only works on chrome for mobile :/

      • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I really wish Mozilla would focus on these missing bits and bobs like WebUSB and this one you mentioned instead of whatever the fuck it is that they’re doing now

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    my issue with firefox atm is that both twitter extensions I use have been hobbled/removed by it for what looks to me to be spurious reasons.

    https://github.com/kheina-com/Blue-Blocker/discussions/294

    https://github.com/dimdenGD/OldTwitter/discussions/752

    inb4 “lol @ using twitter in 2024” I just steal memes from it, and mastodon/bluesky simply aren’t up to speed yet.

    Weighing options though I’ll go with Firefox and shitty twitter experience rather then Chrome and the ads everywhere experience. Not really a contest there. Just idle complaints.

  • Wisas62@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s was only a very brief period that I would have considered Chrome a better option and that was the period when Chrome had a mobile app and FF didn’t. Other than that, I have never understood why you would use chrome. I know FF didn’t invent tab browsing, but definitely the first to do it successfully.

  • breakingcups@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wonder if the recent antitrust ruling about Google paying for being the default search engine will affect Mozilla’s funding.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The antitrust case is about Google and Apple, not Mozilla. It doesn’t mean the antitrust case will have any impact on Mozilla, because it’s not a major player, unlike Apple.

    • anachronist@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mozilla and its murder/suicide pact with Google falling apart may be the best thing that could possibly happen to Firefox.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mozilla makes about $590m a year.

        $510m of that is from Google paying for the search engine default spot.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s a ridiulously low amount of money given the amount of users. I’d happily pay 10-20 bucks a year to keep mozilla alive. Not that I like it much, but more so than the big alternatives

        • UNY0N@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well I for one hope they figure out an alternative income, like a premium subscription? Or perhaps look to get acquired by proton and get some integration going with those services? I’m no expert here, I just think that they have a lot of happy users, and there must be some way to figure this out financially.

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m not aware of any non-profit with staffing the size of Mozilla. The problem is that you need to be able to make money and to set it aside for bad times, so you don’t have to fire employees the moment the donations falter.

              The 501©(3) non-profit form of tax-exempt non-profit, which is what the Mozilla Foundation continues to be, is not allowed to do so. That’s why they opened up the for-profit Mozilla Corporation subsidiary that does most of the Firefox development.

              On the plus side, the only shareholder of the Mozilla Corporation is the Mozilla Foundation, which therefore essentially cannot accept any of the profit the MoCo might make.

      • SuperIce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Google antitrust decision will result in Mozilla losing 90% of their revenue since Google won’t be allowed to pay them to use their search engine anymore.

      • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The biggest pro for me is the vertical tabs. It’s got the same vertical tabs that Edge has which are great. I only use Edge at work but it’s great especially when you have a web based production environment like nCino that you work in all day and have dozens of tabs open. You can group them up nicely and keep yourself organized. Floorp is based off of Firefox ESR so it’s on an older build (but up to date security). The current build is based off FF 115 while FF is on 129 now.

          • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve tried but for some reason, I can never get them set up correctly and I’m not technologically illiterate. Its been a while since I tried it though since Floorp just works.