Just a moment...
www.bleepingcomputer.com

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/20260243

Google Chrome warns uBlock Origin may soon be disabled

Google Chrome is now encouraging uBlock Origin users who have updated to the latest version to switch to other ad blockers before Manifest v2 extensions are disabled.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    0·
    3 months ago

    When Chrome came out it was heavily promoted by everyone I knew (apart from my best friend) I tried it, didn’t like the UI (still don’t) and didn’t see the point of it.

    People talked abour how fast it was, and I felt that Firefox was fast enough, and Firefox just worked as I wanted it to, why change?

    I kept stedfast with Firefox, apart from when the horrible Australis UI was launched, then I switched to a fork called Pale Moon, which I used for several years untill the current UI was launched.

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      it actually WAS really good when it first came out and for a few years, it was also back during the days where google still kind of follows the “don’t be evil” principle.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 months ago

        Yeah there’s a good reason we all started to use it, unlike Firefox it was far far quicker to boot up and load pages. And used significantly less resources, so there was really little upside to using Firefox apart from a few addons not being available for a while.

    • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      Chrome was so lightweight and fast when it was launched. And it had a blazing fast Javascript engine. No other engine came close to it.

      It was a pretty awesome browser back then during the “do no evil” era of Google.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        0·
        3 months ago

        Sure, I get what you are saying, but I never had an issue with Firefox and Javascript.

        • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
          0·
          3 months ago

          Oh, I understand. I’m just saying that the reasons were enough for a lot of people to give it a go, me included. You probably had a beefed up machine back then in 2008. I didn’t, and launching a browser took several seconds, whereas Chrome launched like in one second or so.

          Of course, Chrome started to suck and I came back to Firefox, especially when they caught up with Javascript.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            0·
            3 months ago

            I think it had more to do with the webites I visited, and being used to slower connections