Where should I mount my internal drive partitions?

As far as I searched on the internet, I came to know that

/Media = mount point for removable media that system do it itself ( usb drive , CD )

/Mnt = temporarily mounting anything manually

I can most probably mount anything wherever I want, but if that’s the case what’s the point of /mnt? Just to be organised I suppose.

TLDR

If /mnt is for temporary and /media is for removable where should permanent non-removable devices/partitions be mounted. i.e. an internal HDD which is formatted as NTFS but needs to be automounted at startup?

Asking with the sole reason to know that, what’s the practice of user who know Linux well, unlike me.

I know this is a silly question but I asked anyway.

  • gpstarman@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    fixed disks under /mnt

    NAS in /media

    Why ? that’s what I’m asking. Can’t you just put in the same folder and call it a day?

    I put my fixed disk in /mnt

    My Files, which are inside the partition mounted in /mnt/something has root as Owner. So When I try to move something to Trash, it’s not allowing me to do, Only perma delete. When saw properties it said owner is root.

    Is it because mounted at /mnt?

    Files under /media seems fine. files under /media says it’s owner is ‘me’

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The answer to your question why is because I arbitrarily decided on that years ago. That’s basically all there is to it.

      The answer to your file ownership problems I can’t answer, because I don’t have that happening. My files are mounted like so:

      LABEL=BigHD /mnt/BigHD btrfs nosuid,nodev,nofail,noatime,x-gvfs-show,compress-force=zstd:1 0 0

      • gpstarman@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The answer to your question why is because I arbitrarily decided on that years ago. That’s basically all there is to it.

        Thanks for clarifying bro

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Mounting to a specific location should not affect the permissions of the drive. But in the case of NTFS and some other filesystems, Linux is not compatible with their permission model, so it is simplified by e.g. making all files be only accessible by root.
      You can override this default with mount options, or change the permissions to sensible values with chmod and chown, but I’m not sure if changing them will have negative side effects on the windows side so the latter may not be a good idea.