Gargari@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoTruly independent web browsergithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up1150arrow-down147cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1103arrow-down1external-linkTruly independent web browsergithub.comGargari@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square103linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·1 year agooh yeah also js isn’t very usable yet so that improves privacy
minus-squareLemongrab@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoLol, but also JS being volatile in the current browser makes it easier to fingerprint.
minus-squareMonkderDritte@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoBtw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling. Because, it’s not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant.
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoidk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it’s just js that ladybird seems to have issues with
oh yeah also js isn’t very usable yet so that improves privacy
Lol, but also JS being volatile in the current browser makes it easier to fingerprint.
Btw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling.
Because, it’s not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant.
idk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it’s just js that ladybird seems to have issues with