Long-term carrier lock-in could soon be a thing of the past in America after the FCC proposed requiring telcos to unlock cellphones from their networks 60 days after activation.

FCC boss Jessica Rosenworcel put out that proposal on Thursday, saying it would encourage competition between carriers. If subscribers could simply walk off to another telco with their handsets after two months of use, networks would have to do a lot more competing, the FCC reasons.

“When you buy a phone, you should have the freedom to decide when to change service to the carrier you want and not have the device you own stuck by practices that prevent you from making that choice,” Rosenworcel said.

Carrier-locked devices contain software mechanisms that prevent them from being used on other providers’ networks. The practice has long been criticized for being anti-consumer.

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty sure Samsung does it to appease carriers since they sell unlocked snapdragon variants elsewhere

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Oh there’s a reason. Hotspot bypass being a big one I’d wager, the other being making it significantly harder to avoid ads

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          But I can use a non Verizon phone on Verizon? Are they just trying to dissuade it because the people doing hotspot bypass are likely gonna do the research.

          Edit: oh yeah ads. Of course it’s ads.

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            This was for bootloader locking, not carrier locking. But yeah, they want you to buy their bullshit hotspot plan instead of just using the data you already pay for.

            • Kairos@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Of course.

              And yeah carrier locking is already illegal [if the phone is fully paid for].

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      For quite a long time now, it’s been the case that if your vendor makes this hard as is, a carrier on top of that will make it considerably worse. As an example, take a look at older Samsung devices, that all needed special-tailored roms for each carrier variant