• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 days ago

    I refuse to believe that’s actually truth and not some BS from a professional bullshitter like the palantir cto

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      It is not even a good one. Is this really the most convincing argument the CTO of one of the most aggressive tech companies can come up with? Are these people just facades because with mental skills like this I don’t think they can even run a lemonade stand. What even makes them useful, connections? Willingness to sacrifice their humanity for profit? A never ending obedience to shareholders?

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean I fully believe they don’t understand cause and effect and that curing something down the road doesn’t prevent irreparable harm in the mean time.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    Article quotes 1 CEO, one of their own “journalists”, and 0 labor leaders

    Also he fails to name one noted in the article but they went ahead and published it anyways because fuck journalism I guess. He is lying, business insider has never been a reputable source for news

    • subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Journalism is dead at pretty much all the major news outlets. Its bought and paid for slop that maybe has a human editor if it’s important enough to the wealthy prick that paid for it.

  • WizardOfFrobozz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Sankar did not name any researchers or provide evidence for the claim.”

    Cool. Excellent thing to write a news article about, Business Insider.

  • yuknowhokat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Taking up smoking because they expect cancer to be cured in the future is like deciding to purposely crash your car because you know that broken bones can heal

  • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Cancer isn’t the only thing to worry about with cigarettes here’s my experience :

    I quit cigarettes for the second time when COVID happened. I haven’t touched a cigarette in almost 8 years.

    My sex drive was destroyed, bringing up the laundry wasnt easy, bringing my groceries up the stairs wasn’t easy, I couldn’t bike the miles I can now; My TMJ was going nuts, my breath smelt like shit, my teeth were being destroyed not just yellowing but actual tooth loss and pain, the amount of arguments that I think I spawned just to have a cigarette, the amount of emotional indifference it causes because you’re never truly dealing with anything you’re just smoking instead of dealing with whatever the fuck is going on and actually solving life problems is also fucked up.

    And man are they stupidly addictive, like there’s no possible way to buy a pack of Natural American Spirits and go, “I’m only gonna smoke once a week,” trust me I’ve been there and it’s impossible to just be like “I’m only gonna do this when I…” because you will want it again and even if you don’t them, they might want you and that’s the worst.

    It’s the absolute worst!!! 15$/pack too like what the fuck!!! There’s never gonna come a day where cancer research will outweigh the facts that cigarettes will destroy you. There’s over 5,000 chemicals in one cigarette too, it’s not just nicotine and tobacco, it’s rat poison and arsenics.

  • paraproto@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Become dependent on ____ and pay ____ companies for ____.

    • LLMs, AI, tokens
    • nicotine, tobacco, cigarettes
  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Do they promise? Do they also promise to never spend healthcare money on lung cancer? And will they promise to smoke far away from us so we never have to smell that s***?

    Somehow I bet they won’t make those promises. Because they’re liars. Because that whole field is built on lying. Vaporware can’t make anything real, ever, than the people who actually do the software development are keenly aware of that fact.

  • ishartdoritos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I started self destructing since AI has slithered its way into aspects of my life that gave me a reason to exist.

    Not because I think it’ll save me but because I just don’t give a shit about anything anymore thanks to it’s gross existence.

  • Vreyan31@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is less “omg these guys who work crazy hours are making something incredible”

    and more “these guys who work crazy hours have made up a new justification for their age-old legal stimulant addiction”

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, I remember when Sergey Brin announced Google AI employees should work 16 hours a day to catch up to competition, people familiar with the industry said it’s a low bar for a FAANG AI researcher. They work themselves to death.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    So many people in this thread…You’re the facebook boomer who believes every “Kids are doing [X] because if viral tiktok trend!”

    (No offense to OP, this is a perfect headline for the community)

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      “So many AI researchers have started smoking as a way of signaling to other researchers how much they believe in AI,” Sankar said in an interview on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

      This is the first clue that’s it BS. I would like to believe that the techbros are doing it, but techbros aren’t “AI researchers.” They actually know the limits to their work. If Shyam Sankar wont name names, it’s not happening. At least not in any appreciable numbers.

  • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’d be more convinced if they intentionally contracted AIDS because they were confident in their slop machine.

    … I still wouldn’t use their products, but I’d believe that they believe the word guesser machine might cure cancer