In a well-fleshed-out post, Scott Chacon shows how unneecessary Git 3.0’s move to replace SHA-1 with SHA-256 is.

  • jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Collision concerns make sense. If you manage to get two different files with the same hash, that will cause issues for your repo - the concerns over a collision justify the move to SHA-256 though.