RustyNova@lemmy.worldM to Mimi.@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoShirt Instruction. [241]lemmy.worldimagemessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up1164arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1156arrow-down1imageShirt Instruction. [241]lemmy.worldRustyNova@lemmy.worldM to Mimi.@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square13linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBonsoir@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 days agoEven with a loop, if you consider that you haven’t finished looking into something until you’ve executed all sub-instructions, you would still have to keep track of everything in a stack. You would run out of memory at some point.
minus-squaregreen_copper@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoIf you interpret the text on her as a sub-instruction / call, then yes; you you interpret it as a direct (replacing) instruction / jump, then no.
Even with a loop, if you consider that you haven’t finished looking into something until you’ve executed all sub-instructions, you would still have to keep track of everything in a stack. You would run out of memory at some point.
If you interpret the text on her as a sub-instruction / call, then yes; you you interpret it as a direct (replacing) instruction / jump, then no.