• SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google already rolled out AMP which is overtly hostile to an open internet and faced zero repercussions from it. The same will be true for this. The average person has no idea what this means, doesn’t care, and won’t be bothered by it. Politicians always side with big business.

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m hoping the average user will be sufficient annoyed by the lack of adblocking to finally give a shit.

      • nik282000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Average users view the web raw, this will go totally unnoticed by >90% of users. If web-drm becomes a thing then it will be easy enough to block those sites and add them to the list of media that is morally acceptable to pirate.

        • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is there any reason Firefox or anyone else can’t just draw blank elements over the ads to block them on a separate layer? That way the site still thinks ads are being displayed. Kind of like the browser internal version of cutting out sticky notes and pasting them over your screen to cover the ads.

          • limecool@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Firefox could get litigated for ad fraud and these trusted 3rd parties could block firefox from accessing the sites. It won’t work.