• Flumsy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there any system that is more fair and/or gives you more freedom? I havent found any.

    On a hypothetically completely free capitalist market, I can sell and buy whatever I wish and the value that I get when selling directly correlates to the value I’m bringing to the buyer. If I generated a lot of value, I have more capital so I can also buy more value using that capital. Sounds fantastic in theory.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In an unregulated free market, you could buy milk, drink it and fucking die because it had poison in it.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah of course thats why there are regulations in place. Nobldy would trust that milj seller again though, so for cases that are not as bad as a human life being ended, the system would still work…

          • Flumsy@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whats your point then? That a completely free market is bad? Yeah, thats why we dont have one.

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course not! Free markets are great, they allow me to make money however I please. But if you’re gonna regulate my business, at least leave me the opportunity to exploit my workers to some extent. I won’t be made obsolete by some stoner beatniks who think they can run my business better than I can in some high-falutin’ democracy. I own this place. It’s mine. I bought it with my own bank account.

    • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is difficult for me to imagine what “personal liberty” is enjoyed by an unemployed person, who goes about hungry, and cannot find employment.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Democratic socialism, Social democracy, original libertarianism of the non Rothbard variety, even pragmatic anarchocommunism. As long as they aren’t dogmatic ideologues.

      A completely free market has never, and will never exist. Further markets, and currency existed before capitalism. Capitalism didn’t make them possible. Finally capitalism demands you sell for as much as the market can bare, not what is fair for the value you added. Of which capitalists generally add none. Without labor nothing gets done.

      Under capitalism people that generate most of the value get the least of the capital. It’s just a more abstract way of defining and justifying oligarchy. Other than Divine Birthright.

      Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for rewarding people who come up with new processes and ideas to increase efficiency etc. That’s not really what capitalism does.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would you mind elaborating on the “original libertarianism”? What doed that mean exactly? Could really find much…

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more commonly referred to as left libertarian these days. However it far predates right wing libertarianism. And for myself at least. I personally feel that calling original libertarianism left libertarianism, and right wing libertarianism right wing libertarianism gives right wing libertarianism far too much legitimacy.

          Libertarianism is and always has been a left-wing ideology. These so-called right wing Libertarians(neo-libertarians) have much more in common with liberalism than libertarianism. And equally ironic. Those that we call liberals{neo liberals) in the United States for instance. Often have more in common with actual Libertarians than “right-wing” Libertarians do in many instances. Though there’s still a good dosage of capitalist and even fascists under the moniker of the Democrats too.

          The whole situation is super complex and wildly cloudy due to bottomless pockets for propagandists unfortunately.