I care about my privacy, though I like it’s UI. Is it really as bad as some say?

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yea I don’t think it’s bad for privacy, just there are better options out there which get you the same privacy while also addressing other issues? Issues like Chromium, history of controversies and shady behaviour (crypto, replacing ads with their own), the business model, and issues with the CEO.

      Instead, why not just use standard Firefox? The only downside I’ve heard is that the default settings don’t do what Brave does when you first install each browser, but that’s a weak argument considering we all modify the settings anyway. Someone should just outline which Firefox settings should be flipped to match default Brave, and we can be done with the weekly ‘Why not Brave’ discussions

      I use Firefox as my daily browser, and run Mullvad browser when I need to be cautious with a task.

        • Liforra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well stuff like chromegle, there isn’t anything similar on Firefox, and there are just less extensions in general. Probably the dumbest reason but doesn’t change the fact that i need them

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any suggestions for someone who has multiple clients who solely support Chrome-only for their products so I have to do all my testing in Chrome (or Brave, Vivaldi, etc.)?

      In some cases their apps straight up don’t function in Firefox or look substantially different and I’m not really allowed to bill for the time to address that.

      • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just use something vanilla like Ungoogled Chromium. Don’t use it for everything, only for working on projects that require it.

      • jjdelc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it is because of these lousy developers that live inside a Google world that people don’t want to use Firefox.

        • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair…but…if I start filtering jobs over whether or not I have to support Chrome, I’d be in for some hard times :(

    • wtry@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll do it when Firefox gets a UI that looks modern.

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s always been weird to me how people use Brave. Like there’s a big class of Brave users who seem like people who would just be better off on Firefox? I guess it’s some of the best evidence I have seen that marketing works.

      • Jose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is, that Firefox Android can’t group tabs. That’s VERY important for me, and is the only reason I don’t use Firefox (it’s messy using different browsers in PC/Phone).

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    YES, IT IS!

    You should NOT trust Brave to not play fast and loose with your privacy. They already operate an advertising network (it operates on those stupid little BAT tokens) and they DO inject ads and affiliate links.

    I strongly recommend Firefox1 or Librewolf.

    1 - You must install plugins and apply user.js fixes yourself to properly harden Firefox completely against tracking; but this is doable.

    • Valkeerie@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey, I use Firefox but I’ve never heard of making edits to the user.js config. Could you point me in the direction of some information about this?

    • gothicdecadence@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Someone on the last Brave thread suggested using Floorp and honestly I’ve been loving it. It comes with Tree Style Tabs support but I much I prefer Sidebery so I use Floorp’s built in sidebar with Sidebery instead. It works fantastic, and using Firefox color theming to tweak everything also works well.

  • prunerye@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re on Lemmy. Lemmy hates Brendan Eich. Take the top comments with a grain of salt.

    • Nia [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, there’s good reason to hate the guy, but there’s plenty of controversies the browser has had as well that should ward anyone who cares about privacy away from it, they’ve proven they will do shady stuff without users knowing like affiliate link injection, and then just “apologize” when caught.

      Google would be crucified for doing that yet when a shady crypto browser does it it gets a pass.

      • The Doctor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Folks know they’ll never be Google. Folks think they might just become crypto rich Someday Soon.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It has an opt in option to sell ad space for some of its crypto. Some people just are offended that the option is even there.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      because that effectively make them an advertising company.

      Advertising online is incompatible with privacy, there’s no reconciliation between the two. And whoever tells you otherwise, is an advertiser.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some people dont see it as a black and white issue.

        Does firefox lose its privacy status if it takes google money and makes the default search engine google search?

        • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Definitely yes. Firefox is not private as provided by Mozilla. You have to use a custom user.js to disable all the tracking, or install a Firefox based browser like Librewolf or Mullvad Browser.

          • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hence not everyone sees it as a black and white thing, because there will be a lot of people who would disagree with your statement to some extent.

      • virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately there’s ads in Firefox too, and they’re opt out instead of opt in. I’m certainly not a fan of it, but outside of LibreWolf until servo becomes a thing I think should be right but we’re stuck choosing lesser of multiple evils.

        • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          there’s a huge difference: Firefox does not inject ads on the pages you visit.

          Anyway, I recommend to use Librewolf or Mullvad Browser instead of Firefox.

  • clearleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s literally just a coat of paint on google chrome. You might as well install internet explorer toolbars until an unknown browser appears on your desktop and use that.

    • Tibert@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like Firefox mostly because it’s cool to have engine competition. I mostly use the default dark theme. It looks good enough for me. I don’t look much at the top when browsing.

      On android it’s still lagging behind the chromium competition. And having mismatched browsers isn’t great for syncing. So I just use Firefox on android too, good enough.

      Tho, if miss matching wasn’t an issue, personally I think I would use Kiwi browser. It’s an open source chromium browser which supports chrome extensions.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s less about whether any individual thing they’ve done has been bad, more that they keep doing things and keep doing thm in sneaky ways. Every time something happened the CEO went on a marketing campaign and drummed up a bunch of new users to drown out the news story. They come across as shady, which gives the impression that it would take a relatively small sack of money for them to sell their users up the river.

      Brave is better than some out of the box, but far from the best. I’d say Mull is better for mobile, which is a Firefox fork. It has a companion Android System Webview called Mulch.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Brave is great for privacy. It’s just full of weird cryptocurrency stuff and the company behind Brave is very shitty. It’s my go-to for opening sites that only work in Chrome and its inclusion of IPFS and Tor is pretty useful in rare occasions.

    It’s like the iPod of third party browsers: very polished product with a tiresome company behind it making incomprehensible choices, mixed with a little Google in terms of general internet ethics.

    The Brave CEO+co-founder is the inventor of Javascript, who left Mozilla after controversy following his donation to an advocacy group for banning same sex marriage.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      the page and the tests are run by a brave employee. That’s what I have to say.

      Not saying the tests are false. The code is available. I’m just saying that the factors that the tests evaluates and the page layout, is heavily biased towards Brave. Is that a coincidence with the author being employed by Brave? I don’t know.