PugJesus@piefed.socialM to NonCredibleDefense@piefed.socialEnglish · 4 months agoWhat a strange timeline we live inmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down10
arrow-up141arrow-down1imageWhat a strange timeline we live inmedia.piefed.socialPugJesus@piefed.socialM to NonCredibleDefense@piefed.socialEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square7linkfedilink
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·4 months agoi thought these things were superior in dogfighting, where you don’t need a radar anyway. in fact, remove the hardpoints and internal bays too, then it’ll be even better at stealth and dogfighting.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·4 months agoThat’s the F-22. The F-35 isn’t that great at dogfighting. But that’s not really relevant these days anyway.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoseems like an oversight, in that case they’d need radars
i thought these things were superior in dogfighting, where you don’t need a radar anyway. in fact, remove the hardpoints and internal bays too, then it’ll be even better at stealth and dogfighting.
That’s the F-22. The F-35 isn’t that great at dogfighting. But that’s not really relevant these days anyway.
seems like an oversight, in that case they’d need radars