Rimu@piefed.social to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 5 months agoRsync author responds to online outrage about his usage of LLMsmedium.comexternal-linkmessage-square234linkfedilinkarrow-up1271arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: programming@beehaw.orgprogramming@lemmy.mlpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up1263arrow-down1external-linkRsync author responds to online outrage about his usage of LLMsmedium.comRimu@piefed.social to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square234linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@beehaw.orgprogramming@lemmy.mlpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
Seems like he’s been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.
minus-squareKingGimpicus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 months agoOn the one hand, using a language learning model to interpret and modify a programs code language seems like a no brainer. On the other hand, we have mountains of evidence that suggest the technology hasn’t been perfected. Maybe, just maybe, a disclaimer is appropriate.
minus-squareBazoogle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoHe did have a disclaimer. It says it was co-authored by claude What you see in the commit history with co-authored by claude is the tip of the proverbial software engineering iceberg.
On the one hand, using a language learning model to interpret and modify a programs code language seems like a no brainer. On the other hand, we have mountains of evidence that suggest the technology hasn’t been perfected.
Maybe, just maybe, a disclaimer is appropriate.
He did have a disclaimer. It says it was co-authored by claude