Plastic producers have known for more than 30 years that recycling is not an economically or technically feasible plastic waste management solution. That has not stopped them from promoting it, according to a new report.

“The companies lied,” said Richard Wiles, president of fossil-fuel accountability advocacy group the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which published the report. “It’s time to hold them accountable for the damage they’ve caused.”

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I worked in packaging for 20 years. A bottle CAN be recycled indefinitely… if it’s made from GLASS.
    Source: I worked 8 years for a glass bottle manufacturer.

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Too bad most of those bottles got replaced with plastic completely disregarding the impact of the environment they are causing. Not to mention that glass also comes from abundant resources like sand and we don’t risk running out of it anytime soon, the same can’t be said for oil.

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The real key is local bottling where local production isn’t possible.

      Ship vats of Coca-Cola syrup to the 200 largest cities (more or less) in North America and create local bottle circulation.

      Spice it up with local bottle designs or recycling marks. Now you’ve got novelty sales, collector sales, eco-conscious sales, ‘support local’ sales…

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, as a american- everywhere I’ve ever worked has had a recycling bin but it’s always treated as another trash can. Just something that depresses the absolute fuck out of me.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The whole point of the article is that, in general, it WAS just another trash can.

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why couldn’t we switch back to glass as our primary container material? Wasn’t that always fully recyclable?

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        For people that don’t want to read/don’t already know

        It’s the types of sand, desert sand is useless

        • shastaxc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sounds like someone needs to make a new glass processing method so we can use desert sand

          • force@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sorry but this comment is completely ignorant of the chemistry & manufacturing… you can make some shitty unusable glass with it, but unless you waste an unsustainable amount of resources to try to make the problems less apparent, a majority of desert sand is too low-silica to work. It’s a problem with the material, no new glass processing method will change that.

            And if you do decide to use desert sand, it’s practically a logistics nightmare, especially considering you’ll likely have to be centered in one of the few deserts made of sand (most of which are in North/South-East Africa and the Middle East, but also Central Asia, Australia, some parts of the Americas). But even if you did it’s not sustainable or practical, and it most probably won’t be in the future, there’s a reason glass manufacturing plants smack dab in the middle of sandy deserts have to import their sand.

  • Extra_Special_Carbon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The thing is, chemists knew it. Nobody wanted to hear it. There are only three things worth recycling: Aluminum, glass, and electronics.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s extremely reductionist and inaccurate. Most metals can be recycled easily, not only aluminium.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Aluminium is typically used as is though, while many other metals are used as alloys. I suspect that it makes things much easier when you don’t have to worry about composition.

        Note that I don’t really know anything much about metals or recycling, so I might be completely wrong.