• SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    One of the refunds reasons you can select is “the game doesn’t run on my PC”. This is completely valid.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Or as I do:

      1. Watch videos of Cyberpunk
      2. Think of buying it
      3. Realize I still haven’t finished Mass Effect
      4. Never actually buy Cyberpunk.

      Currently I’m thinking of Baldur’s gate 3, but you know… I’ll probably get around to it in a few years.

      • INeedMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Buying any game after 3-5 years is the way to go. The bugs are fixed, patches are out, so mods are stable and most of the time you can find a sale where it costs 10-20€. And if you forget about it before that time, that means the game was not worth it

      • Ricaz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not that great tbh. I spent maybe 6 hours in it and didn’t get hooked. With BG3 however, I’m at 60 hours and I can’t put it down

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’re allowed to get another game even if you haven’t finished a previous one. You’re only here for like 80ish years so why not sample all that interests you?

        • Perfide@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is what I feel. I’ve finished ToTK and Baldurs Gate 3 once(so far…), but beyond that I haven’t finished a game in probably years. Hasn’t stopped me from having fun in tons of games over the years. I usually play for gameplay more than story anyways, with a couple exceptions.

  • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Complex and recent games run on Linux these days.

    Not allowing run a game in Linux is, nowadays, a choice from its developer rather then a causality. Proton is a really powerful tool!

    If a game don’t run in Linux, via Proton or natively, that’s dev issue that actively blocked Linux.

      • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Still… There are anticheats that allow Linux, like EAC, Hyperion and many others… If they choose one that does not allow Linux, or choose one that allow Linux but block it, it’s a dev issue

        • Elderos@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Virtually no anticheat worked on Linux just a few years ago except maybe Valve and Blizzard in-house solutions. Games that are out and already committed to a specific anticheat can’t do much but to wait, so it is not really on them. Changing the anticheat solution mid-way on a released game would piss off so many people you can’t imagine. On a brand new game though, I would agree that this should be considered.

  • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Blaming the Publishers and Devs because it’s actually pretty hard to fuck up a game so that it doesn’t work on proton these days

  • GenBlob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If there’s a game that can’t run on Linux in the current year then that’s intentional and it’s not worth anyone’s money.

    • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You almost have to go out of your way to make a game incompatible with linux. Considering wine/proton and their various forks cover the vast majority of things at this point.

      Even with ACs, the two most used ones completely support Linux. One is completely out of the box, maybe even as far as linux support being opt out. The other requires you to contact its developers to enable compatibility their end iirc.

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, there’s this very obscure match-3 game I wanted to play because of nostalgia. The series peaked with 3 and 4 (and those are the ones we played on the family computer circa 2015) and worked perfectly on Windows. Now 3 works perfectly (in terms of compatibility) but 4 was better (in terms of gameplay). 4 is marked as borked, last I checked. For anyone wondering, it’s The Treasures of Montezuma series.

    • frazorth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t agree. There are cases with Windows only root kits for DRM, but there are also games that don’t work because of bugs. You see games coming out that barely work on Windows.

  • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d just like to interject for moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, Steam/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Steam plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another component of a fully functioning Steam system made useful by Steam Proton, DXVK, and vital Wine components comprising a full OS as defined by Valve.

  • MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah I can’t play rainbow 6 siege since I switched to Linux but I’m staying strong. Fuck ubisoft. And fuck my friends for trying to make me go back to windoz.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Paladins is a pain for this. Game runs fine on proton, and all it needs is some work with EAC to enable linux on multiplayer but despite all the requests they’ve yet to bother.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    At this point I wouldn’t be suprised that some dev companies are taking Microsoft kickback money under the table. There is really no excuse for a game not to work on Linux natively on 2023.

  • disconnectikacio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If a game cant be run on linux, thats usually intentional. Microshit at least gives discounts to the developer if the game runs only on their shit. Also m$ have some of components that ultimately lock things to wincrap, for example d3d is meant to do this. Microsoft is a cancerm just like google become one

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Time to flip it around. Windows is a cancer.

      Funnily enough, Ballmer backtracked on his “Linux is a cancer” when he saw Satya Nadella (current M$ CEO), make M$ (and its shareholders, which includes Ballmer), a lot of money off Linux through Cloud, or more specifically, Azure.

      • disconnectikacio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think microsoft is the cancer (and google), not just windows alone. Teams is also like a crime against human kind, just like office, and the xbox publisher octopus.

  • Junglist@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been gaming exclusively on Linux since 2014. Gaming on Linux is so good nowadays, thanks to Proton, there are so many amazing titles available to play. Proton makes it all easy - thanks to it, it’s just a matter of hitting install and play on Steam (in most cases).

    There are so many of them, If something doesn’t run on Linux, I just don’t care. My backlog of great games is so big, who cares about some singular titles that are not available.

    I’ve recently been playing Baldurs Gate 3, ARMORED CORE VI, Anno 1800 and Battlebit Remastered on my Ubuntu rig. All run great. Neither need any special tweaks (I own them on Steam).

    BG3 and Battlebit Remastered are especially stellar.

    I recommend BG3 to anyone who likes true roleplaying games with great writing, reactivity and player agency.

    Battlebit Remastered is a great multiplayer title with massive 256 player battles and it sits somewhere between Battlefield and Squad (a mixture of arcade and mil-sim elements).

    • Uluganda@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Modern (post DS2) From Software games tend to run flawlessly on Linux. They are one of the greatest developers now. No bullshit, just greatness all around.

      I heard a lot of BG3, although I dont have any doubt that it is a great game, I dont think it suits my taste. Battlebit tho, I’ll check that otu.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Especially if they use an engine that natively supports Linux, they have no excuse not to release a Linux version.

    • Elderos@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are tons of reasons my dude. You can still have platform-dependant technologies in your game even if the base engine itself supports linux.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well, you can’t blame developers to not cater to their 1% player base. Especially since that group usually have the most problems and requires more development time.

    • intrepid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t remember exactly who, but there was one game developer who was all praises for that 1%. The Linux users were the most prolific testers who sent back detailed bug reports with ways to recreate the bug, logs and often core dumps even. That 1% helped the devs, as well as the other 99%.

    • Goku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is it really that much detached from macOS though? They can dist to Mac then Linux shouldn’t be much different, right?