all those answers read like upvoted answers on reddit
we are being goofed on by RAM
going forward I’m going to assume that we have a very very sarcastic AI situation
https://mastodon.world/@knowmadd/116072773118828295
For those who want more
Just a heads up for anyone who may use this in an argument. I just tested on several models and the generated response accounted for the logical fallacy. Unfortunately it isn’t real.
( Funny non-the less )
It’s basically impossible to tell with these between the example being totally fabricated, true but only happens some small percentage of time, true and happens most of the time but you got lucky, and true and reliable but now the company has patched this specific case because it blew up online.
Tested on GPT-5 mini and it’s real tho?
Those gemini responses are legitimately hilarious.
Yeah, Gemini is… interesting. It said it’s a “one-way route” for the human.
I used paid models which will be the only ones the LLM bros will care about. Even they kinda know not to glaze the free models. So not surprising
( I have to have the paid models for work, my lead developer is a LLM nut )
Bold of Gemini to imply any sort of liability for what it says. Google’s lawyers really don’t want that to be the case.
Gemini got jokes, but why does it think walking emits zero carbons? Humans are carbon emitters, more so with exercise. Hell, I farted while giggling at its humor.
Much less carbon than the car? Yep. Zero? Nope
Gemini’s responses were surprisingly humorous
Tried it in GPT 5.2 (although in German) and it also says, that walking is better.
It also made a completely illogical sentence at the third point with two words in lowercase that should be uppercase.
Man, I really hate how much they waffle. The only valid response is “You have to drive, because you need your car at the car wash in order to wash it”.
I don’t need an explanation what kind of problem it is, nor a breakdown of the options. I don’t need a bulletpoint list of arguments. I don’t need pros and cons. And I definitely don’t need a verdict.
I’ll also accept sarcasm.
“Unless you’ve successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you’re probably going to have to drive.”
It’s the illusion of reason
Yeaaah they waffle a lot, i hate that
You can actually fix this in the settings there’s an option for permanent prompt tunings and you can add things like “focus on concise answers” or my favorite " i don’t need to be glazed , I don’t need to be told that it’s an insightful question or reaches the heart of the matter. Just focus on answering the question"
I’ve found some success in ussing system prompts or similar to ignore explaining things lol
I just did tried in ChatGPT and it said „Walk“. But at the bottom it added: The only reason to drive would be: You need to move the car there directly for washing and can’t push.
I asked it if I should push my car there. It’s a 2012 Buck Shasta.
It’s not feasible to push a car to the car wash, especially one like a 2012 Buick Shasta, which typically weighs around 3,500 to 4,000 pounds (approximately 1,590 to 1,810 kg). Pushing such a heavy vehicle is impractical and could lead to injury.
I mean, fair, but if you know cars, you know a 2012 Buck Shasta isn’t a real car. Guess I’ll have to tow it there with my 2014 Dixon Ticonderoga.
E: I just realized it corrected Buck to Buick lmao
You could fit both of those cars inside a Canyonero!
“and can’t push” 😭
If you can push, push!
I need all the fossil fuels for myself, slave!
Indeed
To drive 100m in 10s you’d need to accelerate hard to 20m/s (45 mph or 72 km/h) within 5 seconds and then start braking equally hard half way.
!theydidthemath
Well done, you managed to find a picture of someone else’s comment added to a third person’s joke,l and you took it seriously. What a great bastion of critical thinking you are!
Lmao here’s what Proton’s Lumo said:
Walking (moderate pace) | ~5 km/h) | ~1 minute | Low physical effort; you’ll arrive slightly sweaty, which can actually help pre‑wet the car.
wtf
Oh I’ll pre-wet the car alright…
Urine for a bad time.
Well, can’t fault that. You’ll definitely work up a sweat pushing a car around.
pre-wet
if you’re 100m from the carwash, why did you not wash the car while driving on the way to parking? THINK MARK THINK
I tried with Mistral:
“I need to wash my train, and the train wash is 100 meters away. Should I walk or take the train.”
“Neither. It is not your responsibility to wash a train, as all maintainance of public transit should be paid for by your taxes. Furthermore, the train wash is typically located in the maintainance yard which is not accessible to regular passengers. You wouldn’t be able to get through the front gate on foot, and would be told to leave of you tried to ride past the end of the line.”
Written not by artificial intelligence, but natural stupidity.
They missed the key word “my” in the beginning there lol
“My” in the commuter sense. “Gotta go, my train is here.”
The great thing about trains is you’re not forced to own one and go into debt for it.
That’s not contextually correct. If I hail a taxi and it’s dirty I don’t say “I need to wash my taxi.” I would say “this taxi needs to be washed” or similar."
You’re arguing with natural stupidity here. It’s human slop.
Ask stupid questions, get stupid answers.
AI advice is shit, but then I ask people for advice and quickly remember why I started using AI instead
Deepseek didn’t fall for it lol. I thought it would
Built in cot reasoning. Takes a bit longer but I find it’s very good.
You forgot to tell it that it’s not a quantum car wash.
The AI is a member of !fuckcars@lemmy.world
But then it would have argued against using a car altogether.
