• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yall are overcomplicating things. Let me simplify.

    Capitalist corporations + infinite greed = cannibalism

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am so confused, i saw this post like 20 minutes ago… how do i have an almost 2y old comment on it?

        Anyway i am pretty sure i meant greedy corporations will eventually start exploiting eachother and the systems that allow them to exist.

        • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ah, that’s just my spicy brain at the helm while I try to caffeinate and retake the bridge. I didn’t even clock the date stamp. 😂

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s remarkable how people can see right past what was actually happening and only see what they want to see. Netflix was never trying to be the good guy. Netflix didn’t offer low prices out of the goodness of it’s hearts. It doesn’t have a heart, it has a ledger. The reason why Netflix offered a lot of content for a low price is because the company was trying to disrupt traditional cable. It was always the plan to increase prices, Netflix didn’t become greedy, it always was. It’s just that for a time the companies greed aligned with the publics greed. Once that relationship was no longer beneficial to Netflix it raised the prices, that was the plan all along.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        But that’s a zero sum argument. Every company is evil following that logic. No company does anything except for money.

        You can make that argument, but it isn’t unique to Netflix.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’re getting there! Just a little further, now.

          There certainly are some companies that seek to do good, or are run by good people. Arizona Green Tea is the current favourite but there are for sure others. The thing is though that there’re huge incentives to being greedy and awful, and a distinct lack of punishment for that behaviour, to the point where so fucking many of these companies are either evil or committing enough evil actions that it doesn’t matter at all the difference anymore.

          Also they weren’t saying that the argument is unique to Netflix but ok then.

          • c0wboy dani@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            soz for necro but Arizona no longer has my whole heart since I got charged $3.50 for a can, they don’t all have {$.99} printed on them anymore :(

            • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              When their background image shows up on retail clothing*, that price hike & quiet pivot to resting on their cultural presence to milk their market was only a meter of time. ☝🏼

              *IMHO, that shit’s right up there with oversized button-downs emblazoned with copious flames around a serpentine dragon/soaring eagle/howling wolf/et al. 🤦🏼‍♂️

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Whomp, that sucks. It’s about on par, and yea I’ve noticed for a while but unless they’ve changed hands, at some point they do need to survive. In the same way I think wages should go up with inflation, I do understand the need to raise prices from time to time as well. The issue I have is with predatory price jumps, shrink-flation, etc. and doubly when the only people who benefit are the super wealthy at the top.

              • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                need to survive.

                That’s the thing though: they don’t need to survive.

                We, The People never needed them to.

                Yet, they gorge themselves on our public funds (ie. “bail out”= oopsie, free do-over w/ bonus) if when they invariably fail to come up with yet another scheme before their greed tanks run dry. (There’s no “if” here, it’s a disgusting “when”.)

                Every fucking time.

                Then, it’s right back to the age-old tradition of bleeding us all more directly —mostly legal, too. 🤷🏼‍♂️

                “Too big to fail”? Nah. Too corrupt to die deservedly, too greedy to change their implicit nature.

                Funny thing about guillotines: they get right to the point. No more bullshit, no more wrigglin’, no more spin. Binary and decisive. Ah, the good ol’ days. 🤪

                • Soup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yes, I am 1,000% aware that no corporation needs to survive. Telling Arizona Iced Tea, one of the few wide-spanning businesses that’s actually decent, that they need to sell at a loss to make you feel good is immensely stupid and there’s mo two ways about it.

                  Maybe they suddenly started jacking up their prices to make huge profits and stopped treating their employees decently, but I missed that news in that case.