• Epicmulch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    You need to consume to live. This means you need to manipulate your surroundings in order to survive. So you need to work to have your basic needs meet. You don’t just get to live with zero effort.

    • Nevoic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the natural order, yet paraplegics live, why? Because we live in a society that attempts to circumvent the natural order in many ways, for the good of all.

      You should take a broader materialistic look on society, who does the work (the working class), who benefits from the work (the owner class), and instead of focusing on amping up people to devote their lives to serve the interests of capital, instead focus to reframe the goals of society to serve the interests of workers, which includes working less, or even not at all. Work is not labor.

      • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s an entirely different argument. I agree with you on that topic. Reframing capitalism to fit human well being is what we should do. But feeding everyone for free with zero work from anyone just isn’t possible. Saying there are starving people because capitalism is just straight up wrong. There have always been starving people and probably will always be. Feeding everyone is logistically crazy difficult. If it ever did happen it would take a ridiculous amount of work and money from a lot of people.

      • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We can provide shitty cheap unhealthy food to everyone sure. It wouldn’t be easy but yeah we could probably do that. But we absolutely would not be able to give people the kind of food they actually need.

          • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It should be sure. But that’s not our reality. Even if you take away monetary value things still hold more practical value. Try collecting and making food for 20 people. Go outside and find all that or grow it or whatever you have to do to get it tell me how long it’s you and how difficult it was to do. Now multiply that effort to 8 billion people.

            • exocrinous@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I will play along with your experiment if you give me control of the government. That seems only fair, since we’re talking about the government providing for everyone.

      • Epicmulch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would love to live in a society where robots over produce everything. Unfortunately that isn’t our reality.

        • exocrinous@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You didn’t read the article, did you? We already live in a post scarcity society. All of our scarcity, at least the kinds that are meaningful to the working class, is manufactured. We throw away perfectly good food in the dumpsters behind grocery stores because nobody paid for it, while people on the streets starve. Properties sit empty as an investment for corporations while people die out in the elements.

    • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thank you brave friend. I came here to say this.

      I’m so fatigued by the sentiment behind this meme and so many others.

      Ergh… there’s something intruding on my video game playing… what an inconvenience… boo hoo…

        • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Compassion is a part of human nature.

          I think that people who need to be cared for should be cared for.

          I think that’s a different issue than the one presented in the meme.

          • exocrinous@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is there a point of disability at which you no longer believe someone should be cared for? Like, say someone is colourblind and has no other conditions, do you think that person needs to earn their life?

            • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              So… let’s keep this in the context of the general population.

              There seems to be a subset of perfectly well adjusted able bodied healthy adults that complain about anything that distracts them from video games.

              I think that’s a problem.

              How about you?