One prominent author responds to the revelation that his writing is being used to coach artificial intelligence.

By Stephen King

Non-paywalled link: https://archive.li/8QMmu

  • RyanHeffronPhoto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s baffling to me seeing comments like this as if the ‘AI’ is some natural intelligence just hanging out going around reading books it’s interested in for the hell of it… No. These are software companies illegally using artists works (which we require licensing for commercial use) to develop a commercial, profit generating product. Whatever the potential outputs of the AI are is irrelevant when the sources used to train it were obtained illegally.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      These are software companies illegally using artists works

      There is nothing illegal about what they’re doing. You may want it to be illegal, but it’s not illegal until laws are actually passed to make it illegal. Things are not illegal by default.

      Copyright only prevents copying works. Not analyzing them. The results of the analysis are not the same as the original work.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, it’s not. Something that is merely in the style of something else is not a derivative work. If that were the case there’d be lawsuits everywhere.

          • anachronist@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            LLMs regurgitate their training set. This has been proven many times. In fact from what I’ve seen LLMs are either regurgitating or hallucinating.

            there’d be lawsuits everywhere

            Early days.