• Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Is it worth trying land such a large rocket/ship when a small capsule does the job? Is it possible at all?

    I get that SpaceX aims for re-usability, but if they have ambitions, go big and recycle materials in space to build space parts/ships/stations in-situ.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      recycle materials in space to build space parts/ships/stations

      If you mean in orbit, that’s orders of magnitude harder than reaching the Moon, and possibly harder that colonizing Mars.

      We don’t have some scifi “gravity plating”, with some force fields to keep air in, to build a space dock, or a factory on a space station. Microgravity is fun for the first half hour, after that moving stuff around is a whole challenge on itself, something like screwing in a screw, or a lightbulb, is a separate challenge. Most of the knowledge about processes and logistics we use down the gravity well, with an atmosphere made primarily of nitrogen, goes out the window in microgravity.

      The nearest “practical” place to recycle any materials, would be the Moon.

      • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        While you are correct. Human experience wise.

        We have long had theories and full maths on centrifugal force’s needed to create a gravity like enviroment

        Its really more about the will and dedication to develop such ideas.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes it’s hard, which I acknowledged by saying if they have ambitions, go big and recycle materials in space. But you make it sounds like it’s nearly impossible, which I doubt.

        We know how to keep air in space stations and capsules, without involving force fields or any other sci-fi tech.

        For sure, building in space it different from building in earth gravity, but that doesn’t necessarily make it impossible. There already have been experiments and small-scale demonstrations in space:

        In 2014, the NASA, in partnership with Made In Space, Inc., demonstrated a fused deposition modelling on the International Space Station and published a summary of zero-gravity experiments in 2019.

        Another example is a microgravity extrusion experiment in the ISS between from 2021 to 2023,

        I assume it’s easier to start by building small parts, and progressively build larger parts, until hopefully we’re able to build most ships parts. The assembly can presumably happen in the vacuum of space, without air. There’s potential for ultimately building ships in orbit larger than anything we could lift with a rocket.

        • zhunk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          SpaceX, in a perfect world, just wants to be the railroad to facilitate others who want to build stations, bases, mining, recycling, etc.

          As far as the greenness of rockets, recycling would be 5th in the 5 R’s:

          • Refuse: refuse to use wasteful rockets? I don’t really know how to apply this one.
          • Reduce: I suppose rideshares and vehicles with multiple hosted payloads are good
          • Reuse: See: SpaceX
          • Repurpose: Wet workshops?
          • Recycle: energy intensive and would need tons of infrastructure to process and use on orbit