• ElderberryLow@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This looks cool but will probably watch others play instead of getting it myself. Waiting for a Pokemon game on the next console. I think we’ve maxed out the Switch.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Gamefreak has yet to make a Pokemon game on the switch that doesn’t run like garbage so hopefully they can do a little better this go-around. I won’t be holding my breath though.

      • phi1997@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Let’s Go Pikachu/Eevee actually ran well, with only occasional dips. Not sure how their first Switch outing was also their most polished…

      • caut_R@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I wish they‘d stuck with what USUM did visually but in higher res and obviously with more eye candy. Neither the hardware nor the studio seemed to be ready for full 3D Pokemon.

        • De_Narm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The hardware is more than ready, there is no way in hell that 3D Pokemon would need more hardware power than Monster Hunter Rise or any Xenoblade game did. Monster Hunter Rise even had a horde mode of all things, using models that are way more complex than any Pokemon.

  • caut_R@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    1. I still have no idea what the game‘s about

    2. It‘s likely cross-gen with the Switch‘s successor and I hope it‘ll be technically more competent than their last Pokemon game - especially since it‘ll have to run on the original Switch again

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Legends means it’ll use the open world battling and catching mechanics seen in Legends Arceus.

      Also features city planning, could be post-war reconstruction in the past (3000 years ago).

      Also, the mega symbol at the end implies new Mega Pokemon.

      And since it has a 2025 release date, hopefully it will have enough time to bug fix. Likely, it will use the existing Legends Arceus engine so hopefully that allows them more time to refine.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s probably the point here. They’re intentionally not showing anything and not saying too much because this is the launch game for the Switch U or whatever it’ll be called.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hope it‘ll be technically more competent than their last Pokemon game

      We all do but S/V sold like hotcakes so I highly doubt it. They really have no incentive to spend any more time or money that absolutely necessary to churn out games.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well it’s a legends title so we’ll likely be able to expect something like Legends Arceus gameplay wise, what I’ll be anticipating is if they’ll do a Galar/Kalos/Paldea super region since Britain France and the Iberian Peninsula are all right on top of each other, and also because of the Gaullic Empire memes it could spawn.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Based on the trailer, I am assuming the entire game is self-contained within the city, though I’d expect it to be a lot bigger than the city was in X and Y.

  • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Fuck I hate useless trailers like this.

    2 minutes to basically announce a title and nothing else.

  • RandomStickman@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Pokemon Z is finally real. Seems like a futuristic setting instead of the past like the last Legends game?

    • phi1997@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it’ll be the recent past, showing how Lumiose came to be what it is in X/Y. A prequel story could do wonders for X/Y, fleshing out Lysandre with an actual backstory could make him interesting.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You wanna know a secret?

        You can do both!

        But Gamefreak knows you people will buy it regardless. Why waste time making a good game, when it’s not going to matter?

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d take another gameboy/DS-esque Pokemon game. Those at least were competently made.

        • thantik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m just so tired of repeating terrain textures, water the looks like garbage. I’ve seen single-developer indie titles that looked, played, and were better written than the last 5-8 pokemon games.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          If so, try Cassette Beasts. Actually blew me away completely unexpectedly, combining smarter combat, really neat pixel graphics, inventive monster names that are of course all terrible puns, and a really really great combat soundtrack that dynamically gets vocals when you fuse.

          Only downside is that it makes modern actual Pokemon games look even worse by comparison.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Because literally every game they’ve ever released looks like shit. And you dumb fucks slurp that shit up like yesterdays cock.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I am guessing this is meant to be the Switch 2 launch title. With that system being delayed (it was supposed to be released this year but now it’s 2025), hopefully they’ll use the extra time to heavily polish the game and make it pretty.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wonder how much last minute changes are taking place in the wake of Palworld

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well Palworld is just a bland survival game that has pokemon in it. The major interesting thing Palworld does is a base/farm simulator where your workers have different specialties and can assign jobs. I highly doubt Pokemon will go that route.

      So the only other thing Palworld does is that it doesn’t run like dogshit and is concurrent multiplayer. So if we get either of those from Pokemon I guess that’s a win?

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It might be bland, but the fact it’s been marketed as “holy shit, it’s like Pokémon if Game Freak gave a shit” says it all about the Pokémon franchise.

        FWIW, I doubt they’ll change a thing. People will buy anything with a Pokémon cover, and Game Freak know this…

  • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wonder if Nintendo is going to be need to change the name given the connotation of the letter Z representing the Russian forces in Ukraine.

    • atocci@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That seems like a bit of a stretch to me. If they felt the need to change the title, they would have done that before this reveal considering the war has been ongoing for 2 years now.