• JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The fine will have to be pretty hefty to cancel out the risk to Apple of PWAs taking off.

    A free and open app platform sitting above the OS is surely a terrible threat to both Google and Apple.

    • shrugal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Up to 10% of global revenue, 20% if they keep repeating the same offense, so nothing to sneeze at.

        • shrugal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Pretty much all sources as far as I understand it. The exact definition is here if you’re interested (Article 5).

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            not exceeding 10 % of the aggregate turnover of the undertaking concerned within the meaning of Article 5

            So I’m not sure what “the undertaking concerned” means exactly, but it’s probably the mobile portion of the business (and maybe just app store sales). But I guess that’s yet to be determined.

            • shrugal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The article even explicitly lists subsidiaries and holdings with >50% of the ownership or voting rights, so I don’t think it’s limited to just one department or devision of a company. But yea, we’ll have to wait and see how this is applied in a real case.

    • ferralcat@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Google and apple both allow pwas right now though, don’t they? I don’t think it’s a threat. It’s just apple trying to say fu to the eu. The eu will slp a billion dollar fine on them. They’ll pay it.