Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to aww@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoIt really didreddthat.comimagemessage-square143linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageIt really didreddthat.comLady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to aww@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square143linkfedilink
minus-squareteslasaur@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoEeeeeeh… Maybe not. It’s pretty good, but there is so much recycled animation that you might aswell call the Jungle book the best aswell. Forgot about Fantasia? Lion king? Don bluth cartoons? Anything made by Miyazaki.
minus-squareCalmChaos72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI’m with you on the studio Ghibli stuff; and the Lion King while a better movie is very polished and to me lacks the hand made feel of Robin Hood
minus-squareteslasaur@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 month ago…but the Lion king was hand made.
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThe lion king famously used CGI though.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agobut robin hood isn’t entirely hand-made, most of it is copied from other films. that’s why there are so many visible roughs in the animation.
Eeeeeeh… Maybe not. It’s pretty good, but there is so much recycled animation that you might aswell call the Jungle book the best aswell.
Forgot about Fantasia?
Lion king?
Don bluth cartoons?
Anything made by Miyazaki.
I’m with you on the studio Ghibli stuff; and the Lion King while a better movie is very polished and to me lacks the hand made feel of Robin Hood
…but the Lion king was hand made.
The lion king famously used CGI though.
but robin hood isn’t entirely hand-made, most of it is copied from other films. that’s why there are so many visible roughs in the animation.