• guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    So could it be plausible one day to run a RAM-less computer? If persistent memory speed matched DRAM speed, would there still be a benefit to distinguishing RAM from SSD, beyond cost?

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      MRAM, FeRAM, and ReRAM all have a limited number of write cycles. It’s certainly possible that the write endurance will be high enough that it doesn’t matter by the time it can replace DRAM in a computer though.

    • Fermion@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Density would be a factor as well for both cost and device dimension/weight.

      Cache is way faster than RAM, but it takes up too much die space and power to be the only volatile memory.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The ultimate goal of persistent RAM endeavours is to build all-RAM computers. You have all your storage and RAM in one. Would eliminate most loading and boot times, if just the density was high enough (actually is for some small, embedded devices)

      • guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s just semantics though. That’s exactly what I meant. No separation of RAM and storage.

        I called it RAM-less, rather than all-RAM, because we already have the concept of virtual RAM on storage. So you could have your files in a file structure and your volatile memory in a virtual RAM file. And you wouldn’t necessarily even need to load files or programs into virtual RAM if you were only reading them, you could have a strict file pointer.