Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago. Mozilla will also shut down Hubs, the 3D virtual world it launched back in 2018, and scale back its investment in its mozilla.social Mastodon instance. The layoffs will affect roughly 60 employees. Bloomberg previously reported the layoffs.

Yo, wtf. Their VPN, Relay and Monitor are basically the only Mozilla services I’d use and pay for. To me this sounds like this is the wrong direction. What do you guys think?

  • LucidBoi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have a bad feeling about this… guess it’s time to learn about possible alternatives :/

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’ve got WebKit, and Chrome/Chromium. WebKit began as a fork of KDE KHTML, and Chromium then started as a fork of WebKit.

      Firefox’s Gecko engine is the only other major alternative to those two.

      • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        chromium is based on a fork of webkit; webkit proper does remain – I don’t know how much of an influence google has on it though; all I ‘know’ is that it’s Apple’s adoption of a KDE project.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After installing a new interim CEO earlier this month, Mozilla, the organization behind the Firefox browser, is making some major changes to its product strategy, TechCrunch has learned.

    Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago.

    Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

    Mozilla started expanding its product portfolio in recent years, all while its flagship product, Firefox, kept losing market share.

    And while the organization was often sharply criticized for this, its leadership argued that diversifying its product portfolio beyond Firefox was necessary to ensure Mozilla’s survival in the long run.

    Firefox, after all, provided the vast majority of Mozilla’s income, but it also meant the organization was essentially dependent on Google to continue this deal.


    The original article contains 234 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 29%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ijhoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They are having the wrong direction since years. If anything, this is the same direction.

  • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hope Mozilla VPN doesnt get shut down because its pretty much Mullvad but you are also helping Mozilla. I also like their relay because their domain is not as blacklisted as simplelogin and addy.io are

      • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        so far it has been working for me. Discord for example wouldnt accept simplelogin or addy but it accepted relay

    • Kekzkrieger@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Does it hold to the same standard as Mullvad tho? Like no logging policy and regular audits?

      • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It literally uses Mullvad’s servers. The only shortcoming is that it requires an account and there is no way to pay with Monero or cash, like most other VPNs. But I just used an alias email and a visa gift card so still pretty anonymous I would say

        • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          where is the proof for that? they literally use Mullvad’s servers as far as I know. Don’t spread something bizzare like that ig you don’t have evidence

          edit: are you talking about the mail relay? in that case‌, email is by default not private and goes through many servers that can read your emails. The only real benefit of using a private email like Proton is that your mailbox is encrypted and that if you happen to email another person whos set up PGP then your email would be a little private. and the benefit of using an alias is to simply not have a common identifier through your email address online when using different services. But if you want to send something super confidential that you don’t want jumping through Google Microsoft and Amazon’s servers, don’t use ANY email. Period.

  • Tash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Honestly I’m actually a little happy about this. I feel Mozilla needs to focus on its core job of advancing its browser and web standards so we don’t get stuck with Chromium-only world (like when us old timers had to deal with Internet Explorer holding the majority market share).

    These side projects like running VPN services and

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the other way around - the side projects were intended to diversify revenue so they’re not comprehensive dependent on google for funding. If they’re canning them then they haven’t been profitable.

      • Tash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That may have been the intention but I can’t find any which have panned out. Mozilla is straddling that weird line of operating both a non-profit and for-profit entity… and as a for-profit incubator for the next big thing, they have a pretty terrible track record.

  • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Article quote “Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.”

    Does not scream privacy friendly, imo

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      In the past, they’ve often spearheaded privacy-friendly solutions, like the translation feature in Firefox, which is already today 100% offline. It’s possible to run LLMs offline, too, for simpler workloads. For example, they could probably use an offline LLM to have that translation feature form readable sentences more often.

    • loiakdsf@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      on the one hand i agree: trustworthy does not mean privacy. but on the other hand: ai does not necesaarily mean privacy invasion (though experience might tell us otherwise)

  • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    and scale back investment in its Mozilla.social Mastodon instance.

    Well shit, I guess I’m never getting off that waitlist. Of all the services being effected by this news the mastodon loss is minor but I was really hoping it’d work out and thrive in a similar manner to Vivaldi’s instance.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Honestly adding more features and services is the wrong answer. They need to strip down Firefox in terms if UI and software bloat. A smaller (ish) codebase would be easier manage.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is management speak for… our shit isn’t working, we’re trying to diversify our revenue but so far just wasted heaps of money. We’re going to cut everything to extend the curve but this marks the start of our death spiral.

    This is a bit left field but… my big idea is that mozilla should become a payment gateway for donating to other opensource projects. They can skim a few percent off everything. Great alignment with Mozilla’s values & history. All open source projects will end up promoting mozilla. Mozilla has the right brand and user-base to leverage.

    Suppose my new tab page showed me a bit of an overview about some opensource project, the people involved, and the people who use the project, and suggested a donation of $1. I would genuinely like that. After a few small donations they could suggest I charge my account with $50 which I can then donate to whatever projects in the coming months as the mid takes me.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That one’s good enough to suggest to them!

      Can see why they’d maybe be wary of getting into appraising open source projects if taking payments, but maybe something they could collaborate on with EFF & others. Maybe also that “alternative to” project, which doesn’t currently focus on open source stuff but naturally covers quite a lot of it.

    • AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Holdup! I genuinely like this idea! On first startup it could ask for it, whether you would like to see this or not.

      What they could do as well, is host their on git (forgejo is the name i think) and this donation built in. Basically what github is doing but without microsoft.

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    AI seems like the latest shiny object they’re chasing. I wish they’d focus on building the most usable browser. I subscribe to the VPN, Pocket, and Relay, but I guess I’ll have to start looking for alternatives? I suppose Mullvad, Omnivore are the way to go, not sure about alternative to Relay.

  • kbal@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    … and scale back its investment in its mozilla.social Mastodon instance.

    In what way did they invest anything significant in the mastodon instance? I had been sort of waiting for them to do something interesting with it after all the fanfare with which it belatedly arrived. As far as I could tell last time I looked it was just a bog-standard and rather small instance that hadn’t visibly changed since some engineer took a day or two to set it up last year. What’d I miss?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think they figured out that its unlikely to make any money. I’m not sure what there plan was as social media companies can do nothing without it being controversial

  • Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Company I don’t like lets go of employees: ❌❌LAYOFFS❌❌😡😡

    Company I like lets go of employees: ✨✨downsizing✨✨😇😇