• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    Now that you’ve let your guard down, Apple is free to do whatever they want. It’s exactly exactly what Apple wanted.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        maybe

        but hat could take many years to spin up another massive lawsuit like this, and, by then, Apple could possibly have profited kajillions, and/or have modified their communications protocols just sufficiently to skirt regulations. or one of a dozen other legal maneuvers around this or a number of other possible future regulations…

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I try not to predict the future. it took them a long time to get here. I they’e going to loop back around, I can’t see it happening again soon.

              • gregorum@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It’s not about the explosive growth (or not) of iMessage. It’s a matter of fact about the legal foothold that Apple now holds. That won’t be dislodged anytime soon. Whether or not Apple can get any market growth moving forward, now the EU will have to re-file any efforts to this ruling to them in the future should they try. That is a big deal. And nothing anyone in trying in the EU will move forward anything near the weight this attempt did. 

        • Zworf@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Also, iMessage will become even more irrelevant now because the other platforms like WhatsApp will be forced to interoperate. By not being part of this “hive”, iMessage will become even less appealing than the others.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        no, merely considered irrelevant— for legal purposes. why? read the headline.

        • sanzky@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Im not sure you understands how this work. but anyway… they can do whatever with their service. I (or any person I know) dont plan to use it 🤷

            • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              Insulting people isn’t nice. The only rule on this understand is to be(e) nice. This is not appropriate behavior for our instance. You didn’t need to insult someone to make your point. I’m giving you a 7 day ban to think things over.

            • Norgur@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Dude, you tried to lead OP off on a weird tangent that

              a) they didn’t follow you on and
              b) was nonsense and lacked understanding on your part from the get go.

              Stop insulting people as being stupid when clearly you didn’t (want to) understand what was said and just tried to tell people who told personal anecdotes that their anecdotes are wrong…

        • Big P@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They must’ve been playing the long game then, iMessage has been irrelevant in Europe since before this law existed. Apple truly thinks of eveything