• Luffy879@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        First of all, its way too clean. The picture has this really sharp look, and the blur looks artificial. The hind leg doesn’t seen normal for the way you see the rest of the dog. Also, the ring of the dog collar has no imperfections, and the dog looks way to still for it to be living.

        • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Look closely at the crud around the eyes, and the matching reflections. No way this is AI. Blur looks entirely normal for a modern smartphone, focus on the eyes with the nose falling off slightly.

      • madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        For me, the dog has a cartoonish look. The eyes seem too large, the head seems too large, and something seems a little too perfect in general.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      How awesome / terrifying is it that this is a question which no longer has a clear answer?

    • drphungky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It definitely looks it (for me the lighting and the eyes) but I don’t think it is. The bag in the bottom right might be puppy’s first food bag, and I don’t think I’ve seen many AI photos with just a partial thing like that that still obeys the laws of reality. If it’s AI, it’s heavily human involved to tweak things until it got perfect.