• OscarRobin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Transmission is awesome because it’s simple. It only does what you need and has the best UI for doing so.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m caught between the dual urges of “reject tierlist, embrace tradition” and “I’ve been sleeping on over a decade of FOSS torrent client development, maybe it’s time to up my game”.

      • frazorth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, someone is just using their torrent client as an F grade *arr and nbz360 solution.

        All the “features” listed as Pros is just bloat.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’m comfy with my torrent workflow as it is. I don’t pirate enough volume to make it worth the time to revise something I spend 0.0006% of my overall time on.

      • oddspinnaker@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I will say, as someone who used rTorrent some time ago to automate torrent downloading and whatnot, it was awesome. I’m glad to see it still going and gaining popularity.

        Stable software doing its job out of the way is what I want.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given the community we’re in, majority of us are power users and transmission is just way too feature light for most of us

      • pascal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        if the community we’re in puts rtorrent in C tier because it’s “UNIX only” then you and I have a different meaning of “power users”.

        • wahming@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Given I was replying to a comment in a totally different context, sure, whatever floats your boat.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being a power user does not automatically mean you need to use Linux. Not trying to defend any other OS out there, just don’t like this gate keeping attitude.

          • pascal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being a sports car enthusiast does not automatically mean I hate Lamborghini because I own a Ferrari.

            You are totally right, what I mean is you don’t have to use Linux to be a power user, but despise it it’s not a power user attitude.

        • wahming@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m supposed to use an extra program to download a torrent in sequential order?

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Depends why you want it. If you want it to reduce fragmentarion, then just enable fallocate. If you want it to download files in sequence, then XML RPC. If you want file to be downloaded in very inefficient way, then be patient.

            • wahming@monyet.cc
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Or, I just right click and select sequential download so I can start watching a movie immediately. This logic of breaking everything down into the tiniest possible bits is how we ended up with ridiculousness like the lpad debacle.

              • uis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, torrent client should leech and seed very fast and very efficient, watching videos is not on this list. XMLRPC also makes it convenient and expandable.

                And sequential downloads are bad for swarm, please don’t do this.

                • wahming@monyet.cc
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Just because your use case is different from others does not invalidate all other use cases.

                  Also, there’s a reason no clients support sequential download as a default option. Having the very occasional download where I would like to start watching immediately upon starting the download is not going to break the swarm, or even affect it.

    • Opeth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if you wanna put on your naughty shoes you can theme transmission just drag flood-ui files in and tada