• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    God forbid you should actually explain it rather than acting like an ass and ignoring the question.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have been finding out that tiring my fingers with people who only pretend to be discussing but gloss over what’s being said is a waste of time.

      I’m acting like an ass because you are acting like an ass. Isn’t it obvious how relevant it is to bring up how DRM personally affected me? Do you actually have a reason to say why losing a game I have bought isn’t actually the fault of DRM, or are you just going to pretend it doesn’t matter? Be it me or anyone else, we can still access games that were abandoned by the developers just fine, as long as DRM doesn’t get in the way,

      If you are gonna repeat yourself with “Once again you have it backwards” don’t even bother. If you really mean to talk it out, don’t avoid the point.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I have been finding out that tiring my fingers with people who only pretend to be discussing but gloss over what’s being said is a waste of time.

        What are you suggesting that I supposedly “glossed over”?

        Isn’t it obvious how relevant it is to bring up how DRM personally affected me?

        It’s obviously not obvious, like at all. I mean if your intention was to create an emotional argument and tell me that you can’t be objective, then mission accomplished. That’s the only takeaway I have without further explanation.

        Do you actually have a reason to say why losing a game I have bought isn’t actually the fault of DRM

        Uhhhh I’ve already explained the reason. It seems you may have glossed over it.

        If you are gonna repeat yourself with “Once again you have it backwards” don’t even bother.

        What words would you prefer I use when you make the same mistake twice?

        If you really mean to talk it out, don’t avoid the point.

        Again I’ll ask what point it is that you think I’ve avoided?

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          And here’s why being sarcastic was the right choice. Pointing out the witnessed practical material consequences of DRM is just being “emotional” because for whatever reason you think I’m not allowed to be upset about what I lost, which you have given no argument to prove it doesn’t happen, or how to prevent or revert it.

          Funny how you quoted every single line except this part

          we can still access games that were abandoned by the developers just fine, as long as DRM doesn’t get in the way

          Which points out that you can’t simply scratch it to company neglect, when neglect alone doesn’t take games away from customers. DRM does.

          How forgetful of you to miss that part, after being so confused about what you might have glossed over.

          Oh well, anyway goodbye.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Pointing out the witnessed practical material consequences of DRM is just being “emotional” because for whatever reason you think I’m not allowed to be upset about what I lost

            As I just explained in the comment you replied to, since you repeatedly refuse to provide any other explanation or justification, I’m left to make assumptions. You’re totally allowed to be upset. “Upset” is an emotion and not an explanation for why you provided a personal anecdote.

            Funny how you quoted every single line except this part

            I only quoted the relevant parts of your comments that I replied to. This one I replied to about 12 comments up. Just as a reminder, since you seem to have forgotten, I said “It’s not an inherent problem of DRM because it’s not a requirement for it to have DRM forever.”

            Which points out that you can’t simply scratch it to company neglect, when neglect alone doesn’t take games away from customers. DRM does.

            You can’t simply scratch it to DRM, when DRM alone doesn’t take games away from customers either. Company neglect is required. You need both.