• FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That’s literally the point of LLMs though isn’t it? An LLM was made to read computer language and output accordingly to reach a goal. I thought that’s what all llms were meant to do.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      No, human language.

      Well, they’ve also been used for code, but that’s still designed for humans. I doubt you could use something off the shelf for binaries.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Code is just a high-level human language.

        When “AI” grifters talk about “language” they’re using the narrowest possible definition: text that can be scraped.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And with machine code, you got to keep track of what’s in the stack, CPU registers, … to make a sense of what the code and the next branch command does. It’s completely unalike processing human language. LLMs aren’t really set up to do it.