pmjv@lemmy.sdf.orgM to unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 1 year ago lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up111arrow-down1image lemmy.sdf.orgpmjv@lemmy.sdf.orgM to unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square15linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresbv@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThat’s some fine error correction.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoActually I think the QR code contains no errors, it’s all in the weird numeric data. There are still things I don’t understand but see my other comment for analysis.
minus-squareEndymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNope, it reads as L-level correction, so up to 7%.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoCorrect. The author used the long numeric section to encode the data, see my incomplete analysis in another comment.
That’s some fine error correction.
Actually I think the QR code contains no errors, it’s all in the weird numeric data. There are still things I don’t understand but see my other comment for analysis.
Up to 30%.
Nope, it reads as L-level correction, so up to 7%.
Correct. The author used the long numeric section to encode the data, see my incomplete analysis in another comment.