• Skipper_the_Eyechild@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Why on earth would a train operator care about timetables over basic ethics? They are human beings, not robots, you know?

    The controller and driver both get paid either way, and I’m sure the train driver is used getting home late on occasion - and I expect they get overtime pay, so he may well be laughing anyway.

    And the controller, or whatever they’re called, will just be seeing it as a PR issue. The slight lost money on the refunds (that passengers actually bother to put through) is easily worth the good PR.

    Edit: Missed random words, impatient brain running too fast for fingers.

    • Timwi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I do applaud your optimism. Wish I could have that same rosy view. Unfortunately company executives have shown time and again their true motives. You are of course correct that they are not robots; however, studies do show that they are disproportionately psychopathic compared to the general population, and the behavior of companies often reflects that quite visibly. Profits and the interests of stakeholders always take priority over basic human decency. It would definitely be refreshing if that is not the case here.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re missing a fundamental part here. The company execs are not the ones deciding whether to delay a train with a cat on the roof.

        That’s the driver and conductor, who are paid hourly or salaried. The execs don’t even know there is a cat on the roof.