• 5 Posts
  • 324 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 12th, 2023

help-circle





  • I’d replace “be prepared to explain to others” etc with

    “Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to selfhosting”

    Be prepared is a bit vague. Your preceding explanation calls out that what is in the poster’s mind is often not clear to others, and the rules are there to remind people of the standards required. My suggestion is still a little vague, but I suspect anything blunter might cause offence.




  • I’m a bit puzzled - I have literally gigabytes of emails downloaded to thunderbird and I don’t get any freezes on searching - there’s 15 years of emails from my personal domain, plus 2008-2012 of active use and then passive amounts since on gmail, PLUS 3 work domains over several years in that set and I’ve never had it freeze.

    My machine is adequate but not top end (32GbRam, Ryzen 7 3700X, 2Tb NVME/M2 SSD) - it was “good” 4 years ago when I assembled it, it’s probably bottom tier by now. Running Arch, but also dual boot Mint - both are fine with it.

    Just checked -there’s 10.3Gb in the personal domain alone. Have a look at your PC config - unless you have tiny amounts of RAM or are running on a super slow HDD there’s something wrong with this picture




  • NOT the person you’re replying to.

    You, rightly imnsho, got a snarky response because you weren’t just asking a question.

    This (below) is fine

    What exactly is the risk to the ecosystem?

    This (below) earned you the snark.

    Since you’re okay with it, you should know what it is, right?

    That reads very clearly as “I don’t think you know shit, prove it, and unless you do, you don’t have a right to an opinion”

    You didn’t know whether OP did or did not have a handle on the ecological impact. Either stop at the first bit, or word the second less aggressively.

    Feedback is being provided here because you are taking an overt “I was just asking a question why are you snarking stance”. If that’s fake then I’ll just block and move on.





  • The ecosystem risk is that a reduction in A. Aegpyti population causes a collapse of the insectivores that depend on consuming it and thus starve, with a knock on effect up the food chain.

    While this may happen, a) predation is not currently any real constraint on the population, and b) other insects have been shown to be able to take up part of the niche and c) this already an ecosystem which been rebalanced - they are not naturally occurring in the US they have travelled over with humans

    Google is thoroughly evil, and I upvoted the cynical parent comment, but on this one subject they are on the right side of the ledger.

    Other non disease carrying mosquitos can take over the ecological niche for a net benefit to humanity.