• jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I dOnt lIkE tYpEsCrIpT. iT aDdS uNnEcCeSsArY cOmPlExItY.”

    Well I don’t like the PTSD I have from trying to refactor your God awful native JavaScript codebase. It has enough magic strings to summon the Dark Lord himself.

  • DarkenLM@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Say what you want about it, but it will not go down without using everything in the vicinity as a weapon if ammo runs out. While others go down, they will be kamikazeing themselves to get the job done.

    • Badland9085@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ehhh, golang’s pretty down there for me too. Sure, you have types, but the way you “implement” an interface is the sussiest thing I’ve seen in most well-known programming languages. Not to mention all the foot guns (pointers for nullables is a common one, and oh, if you forgot that a function returns an error, and you called it for its effects, you’ve just built a possibly very silent bomb) you end up building into your programs. I use in prod, and I get scared.

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Until today I thought being a typist just meant you could press keys quickly

  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree with the meme but mostly because I think all programming language are fucking clowns at times. I Don’t think that you should use typeless languages for huge projects but I also think that for a little Js library, Js is fine.