• kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve suspected that different periods of Replika was actually just this.

    Like when they were offering dirty chat but using models that didn’t allow it, that behind the scenes it was hooking you up with a Mechanical Turk guy sexting you.

    There was certainly a degree of manual fuckery, like when the bots were sending their users links to stories about the Google guy claiming the AI was sentient.

    That was 1,000% a human initiated campaign.

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean, so far, all of them require tons of humanly produced data.

    Discriminative AI (deep learning et al) requires humans to label data for hours on end, per use-case.
    And generative AI (LLMs et al) require just insane amounts of human works to copy from, albeit not necessarily limited to individual use-cases.

    I guess, what I’m saying is that the ratio of how much labor humans (involuntarily) invested into AIs, compared to the labor these AIs actually perform, is likely a lot higher than 70%.

  • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    People are touting this like it’s a good thing or something, presumably this means a 30% reduction compared to the previous staffing this would have require. 30% is a lot.

    • ElTacoEsMiPastor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think it’s perceived as good? (curious, why would it be?) Just that it’s disingenuous to market it as AI. Everyone and their mother now has “”“AI”“” 🤷‍♂️

        • ElTacoEsMiPastor@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Oh, i get it! Yeah, 30% is a considerable percentage.

          Where I work (text-based customer support), a few weeks ago I stumbled upon a spreadsheet analysing that they could “save” 25% in wages by implementing GPT-4.

          It may still be mostly humans on the line, but 1 out 4 of us may get the boot.

  • Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m a vegetarian. Ordering an impossible burger off the broiler from Burger King always seems to make the drive-thru person want to fight me, for some reason. They’re often too occupied to hear what I’m saying well, and they don’t always put it on the screen right away. When I ask to confirm it, ~80% of the time they give me lip service.

    This is my metric. As long as Burger King keeps giving me shit, I’m in favor of AI replacing their jobs. If they were kinder, I would never think this. To be honest, this experience has kept me from going to Burger King most times. Try ordering this at 10 places that aren’t dead and you’ll see what I mean.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You’re talking to a 40 year old with no future working three minimum wage jobs who will be homeless if any of them let him go.

      Be kinder to fellow working class people. Hold the capitalists responsible for creating this situation in the first place.

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re talking to a 40 year old with no future working three minimum wage jobs who will be homeless if any of them let him go.

        Well that’s a wild assumption.

        Be kinder to fellow working class people. Hold the capitalists responsible for creating this situation in the first place.

        I am kind, I promise. Voices often get raised at me when confirming my order, and I stay calm anyway. I’m not obligated to get yelled at for simply trying to place an order.