• ArcticLynx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get it

    If people want a twitter alternative, why don’t they just go to mastodon instead of threads?

    • can@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You badly underestimate the proportion of people who have never heard of Mastadon.

    • NightOwl@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because famous figures or organizations are the primary draw for the mainstream audience over random users. And many use it because they themselves hope to use the huge platform to promote or try to become an influencer.

      • Kaldo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yep, without actual big content creators the platform is just randos talking about their private life. That’s not inherently a bad thing but Mastodon often feels to me more like Facebook for software developers than something like Twitter where’d if actually find interesting new people to follow or art/music/games to enjoy.

        Lack of proper discovery tools and algorithm is also a big issue.

  • Segnis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That number seems like a comically generous estimation in threads favor. The platform seems to have no content whatsoever

  • millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has anyone else noticed some people on lemmy referring to the fediverse as the threadiverse? That’s Threads astroturfing, right?