• LinuxSBC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they figured out that a $130 Thunderbolt 4 100W E-marker cable is better designed than a $10 USB 2 60W cable? I think they should have looked at a cheaper high-end cable, like a 240W Thunderbolt 4 cable, to see how a comparable one compares.

    • Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      This was my gripe with the write up as well. Like everybody, I’m interested in the least expensive option with similar features to the $130 option. Surely there’s something in the $20-30 range they could’ve studied?

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish they tested some other high quality but not as expensive cables against apple’s instead of the total junk ones. Baseus or something.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do know that Apple was involved in the development of USB-C (about a quarter of the people working on it were from Apple) and was one of the first companies to put USB-C on a laptop (in 2015) ?

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember it being fully implemented on my MacBook. What exactly was missing?

            • JWBananas@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The vastness of the ecosystem built around Apple products cannot be understated. You can’t just change the iPhone port every few years.

              Ditching the 30-pin adapter created no small degree of controversy. Though the device itself got favorable reviews, the New York Times’ tech columnist at the time called it “not just a slap in the face to loyal customers” but a “jab in the eye.”

              The Lightning connector was introduced on September 12, 2012, with iPhone 5. And there was so much controversy around it that they publicly committed to using it for at least 10 years.

              The USB-C spec was not finalized until nearly two years later, in August 2014.

              I can’t fault a company for activity committing to a decade of compatibility with peripherals. And I certainly can’t fault them for avoiding the disaster called Micro USB.

            • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              True, because they already had a better connector for that specific use-case. But USB-C and Thunderbolt have been implemented on MacBooks for ages.

      • Rascabin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So what? They didn’t implement the port on the iPhone until recently. When did USB-C come out again? …

          • Rascabin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh right, i forgot Mac’s are primarily used for making phone calls, texts, are kept in pockets when traveling, and USB-C is mainstream now so charging is a breeze, but screw iphones ami’rite?

            • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What does making phone calls have to do with anything?

              And who even uses a cable to charge their phone? I can’t remember the last time I used a cable to charge my phone, it’s probably years ago.

              • Rascabin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Come on man. The talk has always been about apple not implementing the industry standard charging port on their phones. It goes back to the 30 pin days. They just want to make proprietary items for mad profits and milk it until all sheeps wake up.

                • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Both the 30 pin connector and Lightning were much more capable than the ‘industry standard’ at the time they were introduced.