New York intends to have electric air taxis by 2025::undefined

  • ripe_banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why are tax dollar being spent making it a little faster for rich FiDi people to get to JFK. Take the A train like the rest of us.

    There is so much infrastructure NYC could improve:

    • Biking Infrastructure
    • More subway routes in Brooklyn
    • Better ties to PATH and LIRR
    • Expanded and more reliable bus infrastructure

    And that is just what I can think in the moment.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Take the A train like the rest of us.

      This! Instead of burning the money on useless garbage, put it towards the existing underfunded infrastructure which would benefit way more people!

    • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Rail infrastructure costs money to maintain. So do roads, for that matter. If this is the first step towards ubiquitous pollution-free air taxis, we should be cheering, not grousing.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m just glad that vehicle take off, landing, flight and maintenance requires no associated infrastructure.

        • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Does it need road? Rail? Asphalt, steel, or concrete, which wear down and need to be replaced? Or does it just need a standard charging station as used by current EV’s? FFS, get over your fucking normalcy bias.

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Extensive air traffic control and dedicated infrastructure that is applicable, likely proprietary, only for this one service (including anything power related), significantly higher inherent risks in its operation. A service that caters for the slightest fraction of travellers and the more people using it, the less practical an idea it is.

            Normalcy in wanting services that have a meaningful impact for more than a handful of people.