Summary

Marking the 3rd anniversary of Russia’s invasion, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced the largest sanctions package since the war began, aiming to cripple Vladimir Putin’s ‘military machine.’

This move arrives as Donald Trump sidesteps Ukraine and Europe, asserting the US lead in ending the conflict.

Lammy reaffirmed Europe’s commitment, stating there can be ‘nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.’

Additionally, the UK pledged £3 billion annually in support of Kyiv and stands ready to contribute troops if necessary.

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Love the shade reporting here. 3 years after the war in Ukraine started the UK is vowing to get serious about sanctions.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t understand why there are still sanctions that can be applied. Shouldn’t have we gone all in from the start?

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No, because then you don’t have anything additional to add later. You want to keep twisting the screw.

  • aleq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    and stands ready to contribute troops if necessary.

    Won’t this trigger a Russia-NATO war?

    • leo141@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s been misquoted the article actually says:

      In addition to sanctions against Russia, Lammy’s statement also included a pledge to provide £3 billion ($3.78 billion, €3.61 billion) annually to Kyiv and “being ready and willing to provide UK troops as part of peacekeeping forces if necessary.

      • aleq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The distinction being that they will not be stationed in areas with active combat, but rather as a militarized police? Sounds like the distinction is quite subtle in reality and might be (willingly or not) misinterpreted, no?

        • momocchi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          No it means in the event a peace deal is reached the UK may contribute troops to enforce that peace

  • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Pathetic, this dividied by voting age group is only £60 per year. People pay more for streaming serivces! Whike russians are spending about 10% of their gdp (allegedly) on this war… how hard is it to outspend them by EU alone!